Israel Resource Review |
13th Febuary, 2002 |
Contents:
How Terminology Used in the Media Disguises Data . . . And Sometimes Misrepresents it
by R.H.B. Fishman, Ph.D., from A Primer for the
Innocent Bystander
Motivated Reporting of Science and Medicine
What is Used in the News What It Pretends To Be
quotes data (measures, scores)
eye witness report professional assessment, opinion
by-stander accounts statistical verification
opinion of interested parties expert objective judgment
getting the quote right verifying the event
looking-in-the-eyes certifying the claim
photograph(s) ipso facto ongoing events
a fact the facts
trend, estimate, some events statistical analysis
pocket survey, odd case representative statistics
short term visits ["hit-&-run teams"] longitudinal studies
professional (society) endorsement peer review process
broadcast, published in media peer review publication
quoting from the media repeating/verifying conclusions
headline research discovery
scoop research breakthrough
condemnation deductive conclusion
dramatize clarify with data
weight of emotion weight of evidence
present persuasively use scientific method
impress, affect, convince inform, elaborate, convince
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Correcting Wrong Impressions About Eisenhower and Israel's Forced Withdrawal From Sinai
Dr. Joseph Lerner
Writing in the Jerusalem Post on February 7, 2002, Henry Siegman, U.S. Council of Foreign Affairs senior fellow and former American Jewish Congress President, enthusiastically recalls and invokes President Eisenhower's declaration" . . . without equivocation that the 1956i nvasion of Egypt by Israel, Great Britain and France was wrong and needed to be reversed, all three countries pulled out promptly."
|
(This episode is routinely raised by those who want the US to be severe with Israel.)
But Eisenhower changed his mind. In 1965 he said: "You know, Max, looking
back at Suez, I regret what I did. I never should have pressed Israel to
evacuate the Sinai." ("Quiet Diplomat, Max A Fisher", biography by Peter
Golden, 1992, page xviii) Golden relates Eisenhower continuing " . . . if I had
a Jewish advisor working for me, I doubt I would have handled the situation
the same way. I would not have forced the Israelis back." (page XIX)
Evidently Eisenhower did not contemplate that any Jew would have Siegman's
mindset.
As an advocate of "land for paper" it should come as no surprise that
Siegman also neglects to mention what evolved as a result of Eisenhower's
pressure: Israel pulled out of the Sinai in return for a written American
assurance that the U.S. would act if Israel was denied passage through the
Straits of Tiran. A written assurance not honored when Nasser imposed a
blockade on Israel in 1967. Also, Egypt did not follow through on the
understanding that she would leave the Gaza Strip. No doubt Siegman is so
dedicated to his position that none of this matters.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Abington: the Man Who Wrote Arafat's Oped in the New York TImes
("All the views that Fit to Ghostwrite"?)
Dr. Aaron Lerner recently noted that Ha'aretz Correspondent
Amir Oren reported in his weekly column in today's Hebrew edition of Ha'aretz
that Edward Abington, who was the United States consul general in Jerusalem
until 1997 and is now Arafat's top paid lobbyist in Washington, drafted
Yasser Arafat's op-ed piece that appeared in last Sunday's New York Times
along with "one of the Israeli 'guardians of Oslo'". Arafat's PR aide Saeb
Erekat put the finishing touches on the article.
Questions remains:
Will anyone confront the NYT with their misprepresentation of Arafat.
Will anyone ever challenge the fact that Abington receives a 2.5 million dollar retainer from Arafat, following his service as the US consul in
Jerusalem, during which time he concluded hundreds of contracts between the US and the PA.
Would Abington's current fee not be termed a "payoff"?
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
EU Sponsored Israeli-Palestinian Bereaved Families' Forum For Peace Launches Ad Campaign
Dr. Aaron Lerner
Director, IMRA
The Israeli-Palestinian Bereaved Families' Forum For Peace headed by Yitzhak
Frankenthal has stepped up its ad campaign with a new series of full color
newspaper and billboard ads "Lebanon 1982. The Palestinian Authority 2002.
The same unnecessary entanglement. The same destruction. The same victims
dying in vain. Stop Shooting Start Talking. The road to peace is preferable
over the path to war."
|
At the outset of the campaign Frankenthal told IMRA that the European Union
provided financial support and that the campaign cost hundreds of thousands
of dollars.
The Israeli-Palestinian Bereaved Families' Forum For Peace is a group of
Israelis and Palestinians who all agree that Israel should make compromises
for peace.
The "bereaved families" label is applied equally to the families of
Palestinian suicide bombers and the families of those murdered by the
bombers.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Yossi Beilin drawing NIS 350-400 thousand salary covered by European Union
Investigative reporter Yoav Yitzchak report in the February 7th issue of Ma'ariv that former Labor Party MK Yossi Beilin is drawing an annual salary of NIS 350,000 - NIS 400,000 from The Economic Cooperation Foundation (ECF), a Tel Aviv based organization that he formed with Yair Hirschfeld at the end of 1990.
|
Yitzchak notes that the bulk of the ECF budget is covered by the European
Union. In addition to the salary, ECF covers Beilin's heavy travel
expenses - including meetings with Palestinians overseas.
For all practical purposes, Yitzchak writes, the European Union is paying
for Beilin to negotiate with the Palestinians.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
CIA Sources:
Egypt Continues Missile Projects in North Korea
Steve Rodan
Bureau Chief, MENL, Middle East News Line
The CIA has dismissed Egyptian assertions that Cairo has ended its missile relationship with North Korea.
|
In both congressional testimony and in its latest report, the U.S.
intelligence community has reported that Egypt continues to cooperate with
North Korea in ballistic missile programs. The CIA said Egypt remains a key
client of North Korea, which is offering intermediate and long-range
missiles to the Middle East.
CIA director George Tenet referred to Egypt during testimony last week to
the Senate Select Intelligence Committee. In testimony on February 6, Tenet
grouped Egypt together with Iran, Libya and Syria as North Korean clients
for missiles and weapons of mass destruction.
Congressional staffers said Tenet's assertion came in the wake of several
hearings in which House and Senate members questioned Egypt's missile
cooperation with North Korea. In closed hearings, U.S. intelligence
officials reported that Cairo had sought No-Dong missile engines from
Pyongyang.
Note: The above is not the full item.
This service contains only a small portion of the information produced daily
by Middle East Newsline. For a subscription to the full service, please
contact Middle East Newsline at:
editor@menewsline.com
for further details.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Al Quds (Palestinian daily) Editorial Explains Palestinians Won't Honor Security Obligations if Israel Doesn't Meet Demands
www.palestinereport.org
Translated by Joharah Baker
The contacts of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his foreign minister
Shimon Peres with a number of high-level Palestinian officials have given the impression that the tide may be changing in the region towards calm after such a long period of mutual violence. This impression was reinforced by word that an agreement had been reached between Peres and Legislative
Council Speaker Ahmad Qrei', a news report quickly denied by the Israeli
minister.
|
Even the limited level of optimism some observers have relayed over the
current situation as a result of these contacts has dwindled since Sharon's statements. Following his meeting and that of Peres with the Palestinian officials, he clarified his point of view, which did not include
anything new or any change regarding a general political settlement or an
acceptable mechanism for calm.
Anyone who examines the conditions the Israeli premier wishes to impose on
the Palestinian side before agreeing to put an end to his government's oppression against the Palestinian people and the siege on President Arafat finds them nothing less than crippling. Or perhaps they are yet
another political tactic intended to consolidate the current situation and
prevent an end to the acts of violence. In this regard, the move may be no different from the provocative military
activities of Sharon's government every time it finds itself faced with the
possibility of resuming
negotiations or determining the mission of American envoy to the region
Anthony Zinni, for example.
It is neither reasonable nor logical for Palestinians to wage a civil war or
that the Palestinian Authority launch a campaign against certain sectors of the Palestinian people. Nor is it logical that this Authority turn into a police force to protect Israel at a time when the occupation and
settlement expansion continues and when the horizon carries no hint of a
possibility that Sharon's government may recognize the legitimate national rights of the Palestinian people.
Instead, the Israeli prime minister has announced his rejection of even the
most modest of proposals, which his foreign minister is said to have offered to the Palestinian Legislative Council speaker. It has still not been officially confirmed that this proposal included the establishment of a Palestinian state on a limited area of land in return for a ceasefire
understanding.
The Israeli premier's insistence on confining negotiations with Palestinians
to security issues and drawing a line when it comes to political issues only confirms that he has not changed his well-known tune, which relies on military force as the only way to contain Palestinian national
aspirations. This only increases the feelings of pessimism and despair
towards the possibility of reaching - in the near future - an initial understanding between the two sides that would lead to the immediate resumption of the political process where it left off in Taba,
according to the Clinton proposal. The suffering of the Palestinian and Israeli peoples will thus increase and will threaten security and stability in the region as a whole.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
The Palestinians See a 'Joan of Arc'
[Wafa Idris - Bomber From Arafat's Fatah]
Uri Nir
Senior Arab Affairs Correspondent, HaAretz
Wafa Idris, who detonated a bomb on Jaffa Street in Jerusalem two weeks ago,
killing herself and an 81-year-old man, and injuring 140 people, was the
first Palestinian woman to carry out a suicide attack. Though Israeli
security officials are not entirely convinced that Idris's intention was
indeed a suicide attack, her action has triggered a debate about Islamic
ethics in the Arab world. Idris has lit a fuse, lighting up the imagination
of many Palestinians and Arabs; for many, she is a heroic Muslim patriot,
and also a feminist
|
Idris had been active in the Fatah movement; and it was Fatah's military
wing, the Al-Aqsa Brigades, who took responsibility for the terror attack.
Since her death, she has been perceived as a national, and pan-Arab,
heroine. Arab-language newspapers circulating both in the territories and in
the Arab world, have given space to public discussion of her act; the
debates are conducted both from a religious standpoint, and from a
social-cultural point of view. The Middle East Media and Research Institute
(MEMRI - www.memri.org), which runs offices in Jerusalem and in Washington,
has compiled some of these discussions about Idris.
Particularly in Palestinian newspapers, the commentators have wondered
whether Idris was motivated by emotional distress. According to reports, she
married a cousin at the age of 16, and was divorced nine years later because
she had not been able to bear a child. Friends and family relations told
reporters that her divorce might have compelled her to carry out the suicide
attack.
After her divorce, Idris worked as a volunteer for the Palestinian Red
Crescent emergency medical service. Some relatives and friends have
speculated that her trying experience attending to victims of the intifada
led her to take vengeance against Jews.
Though many Palestinians have expressed astonishment that a terror attack
was perpetrated by a woman, most have justified Idris' action. Such support
was exemplified at a symbolic funeral service for Idris that Fatah held in
Ramallah. Eulogists from the whole spectrum of Palestinian politics praised
her.
In the religious sphere, leaders of most Islamic organizations in the
territories have concurred that Idris' attack was permissible, and just,
given Islamic law and tradition (their position has been supported by one of
Egypt's most respected Islamic sages). Hamas leaders in the territories such
as Hassan Yusuf have stated explicitly that "Jihad against the enemy is an
obligation borne not only by men, but also by women." Islam, these Hamas
leaders emphasize, does not distinguish between men and women on the
battlefield.
Yet Hamas' spiritual leader, Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, has taken a skeptical
position on the subject of women and suicide attacks. He told the
London-based newspaper Al-Sharq al-Awsat that "at the present stage," there
is a sufficient number of men who are prepared to carry out such attacks,
and that "for the time being women do not have a military organization"
within the Palestinian Islamic movement. Yassin explained that though a
woman is entitled to take part in the holy war, a man must supervise her
acts. Three days after noting this requirement of male chaperons for Islamic
women fighters, Yassin clarified his view; he explained that a male escort
is necessary if a a woman is to be gone "longer than a night and a day" in a
military action. Should the the action be shorter in duration, "she doesn't
need a [male] supervisor."
Ataf Alian, a Palestinian woman from the Islamic Jihad organization who was
involved in an attempt to explode a car bomb in Jerusalem in 1987,
challenged Yassin's view. Alian, who did part of her extended prison term in
Israel, and who was released as a result of the Oslo Accords, was lauded in
an article published in an Islamic Jihad journal in 1989 as a model of "the
Islamic woman of our generation, who obliges the orders of religious law . . .
and all commandments and prohibitions, including the desire to make it to
heaven via self-sacrifice." Interviewed last week by Al-Sharq al-Awsat,
Alian criticized Yassin's position, and said that the order to send a
chaperon to supervise a woman during a suicide attack is impractical, and
also not required by religious law. Her position drew upon oral traditions
concerning the views of the prophet Mohammed. Under these traditions, a
woman is obligated to take part in jihad, even without the consent of her
husband, should an enemy invade a Muslim land.
Idris has been praised widely in Arabic language newspapers. MEMRI
researchers say that scarcely a day goes by without five to 10 articles
being published in praise of her act. Arab pundits compare her to Joan of
Arc; in Baghdad, journalists reported that Saddam Hussein has ordered that a
monument be built in her honor.
Particularly effusive with praise for Idris are Egyptian journalists, both
in the state-sponsored newspapers and also opposition journals. For
instance, Ahmad Bahajat, a columnist for Al- Ahram, wrote that Idris will go
down in history as a symbol of heroism; alluding to her work for the Red
Crescent, he added that "she expanded the sphere of her work from saving
individuals, to saving the Palestinian people."
Is Idris a feminist symbol?
Wafa Idris has been adopted by some Arab feminists to promote their agenda.
For instance, Dr. Samiah Sa'ad a-Din, who has a column in the Cairo-based
newspaper Al-Akhbar, wrote that "the limbs of this woman martyr sketched the
outline of change . . . in the ideology of the struggle. Palestinians have
ripped out the mention of gender in their identity documents, and declared
that sacrifice for Allah will not only be done by men; all the women of
Palestine will advance the history of liberation with their blood, and
become time bombs posed to strike the Zionist enemy. They will no longer be
content with the role of being mothers to martyrs."
In contrast, Islamic Jihad men have used Idris' example to denounce
feminism. An editorial published by the Islamic, Cairo-based weekly Al-Sha'b
declared that Idris was a woman "who taught Muslim women the meaning of
genuine liberation . . . For the woman, the meaning of liberation is to free
the body from the hardships of this world, and bravely embrace death."
This article ran in Ha'aretz on February 10, 2002
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Israel's Requirement For the Next Palestinian Arab Leader:
Declare in Arabic, "No to the "Right of Return"
David Bedein
Details of the meetings held on February 8th between US President Bush and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon are emerging.
|
It is becoming increasingly clear that the Bush administration will not protest too vehemently if Israel's isolation of Arafat will lead to the downfall of the PLO leader.
After a week in which Arafat delivered tirades almost every night in Ramallah to excoriate "hundreds of suicide bombers to die in the liberation of Jerusalem", and after a week in which fatal PLO attacks claimed the lives of Israeli women almost every day, it would seem that few Israelis would shed a tear when Arafat leaves the scene.
The US and Israel have been quoted as seeking a successor to Arafat among the PLO's "war lords". The short term American and Israeli criteria for recognizing a successor to Arafat is simple: someone who would can maintain law and order and "prevent further terror".
Indeed, as Ariel Sharon stepped off the plane from the US, he was "greeted" with yet another Arab terror attack in the Israeli city of Beersheva, which Arafat's Palestinian Authority maps describe as an illegal Israeli settlement that replaced the Arab town of Bir A Sibi in 1948.
The official PBC radio of the Palestinian Authority has justified attacks in Israeli cities of Beer Sheva, Hadera, Netanya and Naharia, since these towns all replaced Arab villages in 1948, after which the residents of these and hundreds of other Arab towns were dumped into Arab refugee camps
which are operated to this day by the UN, under the premise and promise of the "right of return" to the 531 Arab villages that were wiped out in 1948.
Under Arafat's leadership, the Palestinian Authority mandated that the suffering in the refugee camps must continue.
Arafat has declared time and time again that the "right of return" must be the prime agenda item for his people. Therefore, the
Intifada al Awhda, the "rebellion for the right of return"
has become the slogan for the current state of unrest.
If Arafat is replaced by yet another Palestinian leader who believes in continuing to confine more than a million 1948 Palestinian Arab refugees and their descendents from 1948 to refugee camps under the "right of return", the middle east will see more unrest, not less.
While at least one Palestinian Authority leader has declared that the time has come to abandon the idea of the right of return, he is not allowed to say so on any media outlet of Arafat's regime.
That is because the "right of return" dominates all policy proclamations in the Arabic language radio, TV or newspapers of the Palestinian Authority since the emergence of the PA in 1994.
While many Israelis may be ready for a two state solution, such an idea is foreign to the ethos of the Palestinian Arab entity that Arafat has forged.
At this point in time, every candidate the US and Israel have examined to succeed Arafat has sworn allegiance to the
Intifada al Awhda, the "rebellion for the right of return".
Only if a Palestinian Arab leader emerges who will communicate to his people in their own language that he is ready to remove Arab refugee camps and live with Israel without advocating the "right of return", will peace in the middle east be at all forseeable.
Bush and Sharon should keep that in mind and not look for short term solutions for "preventing terror".
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Go to
the Israel Resource
Review homepage
The Israel Resource Review is brought to you by
the Israel Resource, a media firm based at the Bet Agron Press Center in
Jerusalem, and the Gaza Media Center under the juristdiction of the Palestine
Authority.
You can contact us on media@actcom.co.il.
|