Israel Resource Review 15th Febuary, 2003


Coping with the Image of "Apartheid on the Prairie":
The PR debacle of the Israeli Jewish residents of Judea, Samaria, Katif and Golan
David Bedein

The Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the umbrella arm of the organized Jewish community in the US, has scheduled a debate on the subject of Israel's settlement policies for their annual conference which is slated for February 23rd in Baltimore.

JCPA had received a volume of material culled from organizations that have made the case to the American government and the Jewish community in the US that the Jewish communities which Israel established beyond the1948/1967 armistice lines has been some kind of criminal act, and that these Jewish communities somehow stand as an obstacle to peace.

It would surprise most people to know that the Israeli Jewish communities of Judea, Samaria, Katif and the Golan have not displaced a single Arab village, because of a principle laid down by PM Menachem Begin in 1977, which is that no Jewish settlement in the areas to be settled by Israel would displace an Arab village - unlike the policies of the Israel Labor Party government which - as a matter of policy - built Jewish communities to replace the 531 Arab villages that were abandoned by their Arab residents during the 1948 war.

Yet the PLO/Peace-Now misinformation machine, working with funding from the EU ( European Union) have set up an organization known as "settlement watch", which swamps the media with timely reports that portray the Jewish residents of Yesha as criminal interlopers who have encroached on Arab land.

An array of human rights organizations, all funded through the New Israel Fund (NIF) and the EU, overwhelm the media with supportive data with the aim of painting the ugliest picture possible of the Jewish residents of these areas.

The strategy of demonizing the Jewish population of Yesha was formally proposed to Prime Minister Rabin by his PR maven, Yekutiel Federman, on the pages of the Mapam publication, Al HaMishmar in October, 1993.

Federman's strategy was carefully adopted as the methodology of promoting the Oslo process . . . by portraying "land-grabbing Jews" in Yesha and the Golan as the 5% of the Israeli population that stands in the way of peace with the PLO, which supposedly became Israel's peace partners who were supposedly ready to settle for the west bank and Gaza as the area for an eventual Palestinian Arab entity. Jews who raised questions about the Oslo process were simply defined as "warmongers".

The fact that for the past ten years the PLO and the Palestinian Authority have continued to demand all of Palestine in all Arabic public statements and all Arabic publications has hardly been reported.

All you have to do is to read the reports of B'tzelem, funded by the NIF and the EU and staffed by Arab researchers sympathetic to the PLO, and you will get the idea that the Jews of Yesha must have been trained by Louis Lepke's "Murder Incorporated".

What the PLO and Peace Now do to "sell" their claim of the"settler-criminals" to the media is to operate tours of the Jewish communities of Yesha for the clueless foreign media.

We have confirmed with Peace Now spokesmen that they actually tell the reporters that the settlers live in caves, waiting in ambush to pounce on passing Arab vehicles.

We have also confirmed with Peace Now spokesmen that they will actually stand on top of a hill overlooking Gush Etzion with their media guests and say to them that the entire area was stolen from Arab farmers, portraying them as the personification of"apartheid on the prairie".

Meanwhile, the maps issued by the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan specifically identify the lands of Gush Etzion as "Jew land".,

It is my hope and prayer that Jewish organizations will allocate resources to facilitate tours of Judea, Samaria, Katif and Jerusalem for foreign journalists along with well researched reports, to counter hostile propaganda with factual press briefings, interviews with victims of terror, and more.

To paraphrase Goebells, a lie repeated often enough becomes believable.

A lie which is repeatedly sold to the media with no rebuttal becomes part of the media gospel.

It is difficult to forget the Peace Now press conference in November, 2000. when Peace Now appealed to the PLO to stop firing in the direction of Gilo. Only in the direction of Gilo. Murdering Jews elsewhere beyond the green line was therefore permissable.

Joseph Mengele would have been proud.

In his parting news article as a member of the Knesset, Peace Now founder and Meretz MK Prof Amnon Rubinstein noted that the PLO defines the entire state of Israel as one illegal settlement where it is permissable for the PLO to murder Jews. (The full article appeared in HaAretz on February 5, 2002)

How many people know that the PLO defines an "illegal settlement" as any area where Jews replaced Arab villages?

Meanwhile, if the JCPA does pass a resolution that calls on Israel to remove Jews from Judea, the name of the organization may soon be changed to The "JUDENREIN COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS"

The JCPA will not allow any Jew who lives in Judea, Samaria Katif or one of the post-1967 neighborhoods of Jerusalem to take part in their discussion.

A Jew invited from these communities in Israel could make the case that their presence does not stand in the way of peace.

Do diaspora Jews think that they can debate the fate of Jews in Israel without even hearing them speak?

Is that not the demonization of Jews of the worst kind?

Printer friendly version of this article

Return to Contents

Go to the Israel Resource Review homepage

The Israel Resource Review is brought to you by the Israel Resource, a media firm based at the Bet Agron Press Center in Jerusalem, and the Gaza Media Center under the juristdiction of the Palestine Authority.
You can contact us on