Israel Resource Review |
9th July, 2001 |
Contents:
Israeli Defense Minister Ben Eliezer On the Record: CIA Trained Snipers with Israeli Knowledge of Such
Israeli Defense Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer
acknowledged on July 1, 2001 that the United States Central
Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) trained P.L.O. death
squads in the United States with the approval of the
Barak Government and Mr. Shimon Peres, currently
Foreign Minister in the Sharon Government
and formerly Minister of Regional Cooperation in the
Barak Government.
|
Defense Minister Ben-Eliezer made his remarks during a
press conference at the Inbal Hotel (formerly
the Laromme Hotel) in Jerusalem, organized by the
Foreign Press Association in Israel (F.P.A.).
Mr. Ben-Eliezer was responding to a question posed by
F.P.A. member Mr. Aryeh Gallin of the Root & Branch
Information Services.
Gallin Question (verbatim):
"While Netanyahu was prime minister, C.I.A. Chief John
Deutsch appointed George Tenet to serve as C.I.A.
liaison between Israel and the P.L.O.
While Barak was prime minister, then Regional
Cooperation Minister Shimon Peres agreed to Tenet's
request that the P.L.O. send 40 quote unquote
"policemen" for advanced C.I.A. sniper, marksmanship
and advanced weapons training in Virginia.
Mr. Defense Minister, are not those C.I.A. trained
P.L.O. squads the very ones today inflicting such
terrible casualties on so-called Arab
collaborators, the I.D.F., and Jews in Gilo and
especially in Judea, Samaria and Gaza?
And, Mr. Defense Minister, why was the C.I.A. request
to train these P.L.O. squads routed through and
approved by a Regional Cooperation Minister, Mr.
Shimon Peres?"
Ben-Eliezer Answer:
'It's an easy question. We thought that they would
behave themselves'.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Arafat's Condolences to Tel-Aviv Disco Bomber's Family . . .
MEMRI dispatch No. #237
July 8, 2001
Arafat's Condolences to Tel-Aviv Disco Bomber's Family:
"The Heroic Martyrdom Operation" . . . "A Model of Manhood and
Sacrifice for Allah and the Homeland . . . "
|
On June 24, 2001, the German TV network, Westdeutscher
Rundfunk (WDR) aired in its weekly program, "Weltspiegl" a
news special titled "The Father of the Terrorist." The
program briefly focused on the life of the Tel-Aviv disco
suicide bomber and his family and friends reaction to his
martyrdom in which 21 mostly teenagers were killed and over
100 injured. In one segment of the report the sister of
the bomber is seen flipping through a scrapbook which
includes pictures, news clippings, and letters regarding
her dead brother's suicide attack. Among the letters
included is one from Yasser Arafat sent by the Palestinian
Embassy in Jordan, praising his heroism(1). The German TV
narrator said about Arafat's letter the following:
"The album, a telltale collection of condolence letters.
This one here from the Hamas. But much more surprising for
us, there is also a letter from Arafat. It was a heroic
deed, he lets his embassy in Jordan write to the family.
To turn one's body into a bomb is the best example of
willingness to make a sacrifice. Signed Yasser Arafat.
[Is] the assassin, the great role model for the President
of Palestine, as well?"
Segments from the text of the letter as visible from the
German TV report*:
In English:
Embassy of the State of Palestine
The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
Amman
The emblem of the embassy with the Al-Aqsa Mosque and a map
of Palestine [including what is now Israel]
In Arabic:
To the brothers, the family of Al-Hotary and the Noble
People of Qalqilya,
With hearts that believe in Allah's will and
predetermination, we have received the news about the
martyrdom of the martyr . . . Al-Hotary, the son of
Palestine, whose noble soul ascended to . . . in order to rest
in Allah's Kingdom, together with the Prophets, the men of
virtue, and the martyrs. The heroic martyrdom operation
. . . who turned his body into bombs . . . the model of manhood
and sacrifice for the sake of Allah and the homeland . . .
[Unclear lines] that the martyr be . . . in Allah's mercy and
will . . . Allah's grace and satisfaction . . . will inspire all
members of his family . . . The best of condolences. To Allah
we belong and to him we return back [Koran]
Yasser Arafat, the President of the State of Palestine
Chairman of the Executive Committee of the PLO
Chairman of the Palestinian National Authority
[Stamp Emblem]
*The German television cassette, the script (and its
English translation) and copies of captions from the video
containing images of the letter, are available upon request.
The Palestinian media recently reported other such
instances as well. For example:
On June 8, 2001, a funeral was held in the town of Tulkarm
for an activist of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Ashraf
Al-Bardawil, who died while preparing an explosive devise
for another terrorist act. In his eulogy, the PA Governor
of Tulkarm, 'Izz Al-Din Al-Sharif, delivered the
condolences of Yasser Arafat to the family.
The Islamic Jihad Weekly, Al-Istiqlal, praised many
terrorist attacks Al-Bardawil participated in, including
placing a car bomb in Netanya [Israel].
Source: Al-Quds, June 9, 2001.
In late April, Hassan Muhhamad Al-Qadhi, the murderer of
the 16-year-old Israeli who was tempted through the
internet to come to the PA territory - was himself killed
while preparing explosives for another terrorist operation.
On May 5, 2001, his family put an ad in the PA paper
Al-Ayyam thanking Yasser Arafat, "The father of all
martyrs" for extending condolences to the family of the
martyr and the whole clan of Al-Qadhi "for the martyr of
the revolution and the homeland."
Source: Al-Ayyam, PA, May 5, 2001.
Endnote:
(1) The PA daily Al-Ayyam, reported on June 24, 01 that on
June 23, 2001 Yasser Arafat's bureau in Ramallah, denied
the claims of the German TV station according to which they
have a letter by Arafat praising the Martyrdom operation
that caused the death of 21 Israeli youth. Arafat's bureau
said that the letter is a forgery.
The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an
independent, non-profit organization that translates and
analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles
and documents cited, as well as background information, are
available on request.
The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI)
P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837
Phone: (202) 955-9070
Fax: (202) 955-9077
E-Mail: memri@memri.org
www.memri.org
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Families of Slain Americans Upset by State Dept. Treatment
Julie Stahl
Jerusalem Bureau Chief
Jerusalem (CNSNews.com) - The families of two
Americans recently murdered by Palestinians say their
grief has been compounded by the treatment they
received from U.S. diplomatic missions in Israel,
according to sources in Jerusalem.
|
Two American citizens with dual Israeli nationality
have been murdered in the past seven weeks, bringing
to 18 the total number of Americans killed in
Palestinian terrorist attacks since 1993, when the
Israeli-Palestinian Oslo peace accords were signed at
the White House.
Sarah Blaustein, 53, was one of two people killed on
May 29 when the van in which she was traveling came
under fire from Palestinian gunmen. Blaustein's
husband, son and two other people were injured in the
attack.
Blaustein had just fulfilled her lifelong dream of
living in the Biblical Promised Land last August when
she and her husband moved to Efrat, a Jewish community
of some 9,000 residents, in disputed territory 10
miles outside of Jerusalem. The road connecting the
settlement to Jerusalem has repeatedly come under
Palestinian gunfire attack.
Blaustein's sister-in-law, Cheryl Unterberg, told a
small gathering in Jerusalem earlier this week that
the family was upset by the U.S. missions' reaction to
the family during their time of tragedy.
Unterberg said the family had asked Ambassador Martin
Indyk to attend the funeral "to pay his respects," but
had been told that where they lived was within the
jurisdiction of the U.S. Consulate-General in eastern
Jerusalem.
Because Washington does not recognize Israel's
sovereignty over East Jerusalem or the West Bank,
those areas fall outside the sphere of its embassy in
Tel Aviv.
At the time the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv issued a
statement condemning the murder and expressing regret
for the ambassador's inability to attend the funeral.
"Ambassador Indyk . . . expressed deep regret at his
inability to attend [the] funeral for Sarah
Blaustein," a statement from the Embassy said. "The
West Bank is the official responsibility of the
Consulate-General in Jerusalem and Ambassador Indyk is
not authorized to attend events there, including the
funeral in Efrat."
Nevertheless, the Consulate-General, whose area of
jurisdiction includes the Palestinian Authority areas,
also declined to attend the funeral or to pay a
condolence call on the family.
"We're not trying to make a [political] statement,"
said Unterberg, who herself moved from the U.S. six
years ago. "We're only asking for a little show of
humanity. But the Consulate-General could not show
even that."
According to Unterberg the Consul-General, Ronald
Schlicher, made various excuses why he could not come,
including the fact it was "too political," he does not
pay condolence calls, and he can't visit Jewish
settlements.
She noted that two weeks later, however, an official
from the Consulate did visit a neighbor of hers in
Efrat. But even then the staffer could not be
persuaded to stop at their home and offer her
condolences.
"This is how we're treated by the American
government," she said.
Another American, 14-year-old Ya'acov Mandell was
bludgeoned to death with rocks along with a friend on
May 9. Indyk also condemned that murder but declined
to pay his respects to the family, said David Bedein,
a family friend and journalist.
A spokesman at the Consulate said on Monday that
Schlicher had not attended the funerals or visited the
families "for security reasons." At the time of the
murders, "U.S. officials were not allowed to go to the
West Bank," he said.
No rewards
The State Department has been accused of turning a
blind eye to the killing of Americans when the
murderers are of Palestinian origin.
Recently 26 Congressmen presented a letter to
Secretary of State Colin Powell, urging the Bush
administration to offer rewards for the Palestinian
killers of U.S. citizens as it does for other
murderers of Americans.
In the bipartisan letter, the Congressmen said they
were "concerned that the U.S. government has not yet
offered rewards for information leading to the capture
of Palestinian terrorists who have killed or injured
American citizens.
"This is of particular concern," they said, "because
we understand that such rewards are offered in many
other cases in which terrorists have harmed Americans
overseas."
The lawmakers noted that the State Department web
site, "singles out many individual cases, offers
varying amounts of money for the different cases, and
publicizes the awards in the local media of the
country where the crime took place."
The congressmen acknowledged that there were sensitive
political and national security interests at stake.
Nevertheless, they urged the administration to offer
rewards based on the U.S. commitment "to ensuring
justice and fighting terrorism."
This ran on the CNS wire on July 2, 2001
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Fatah Website Editorial: Coordination Between "National and Islamic Forces"
Official Fatah Website Editorial: Sharon's Instinctive Aggression
[Palestinians should not shoot in populated areas, collaborators should be
apprehended, no "political arrests"]
|
[IMRA: The most telling segment in this Fatah editorial states that
"National and Islamic forces also coordinate with the security forces to
provide an atmosphere of safety for the citizens. Security forces also
ensure that the law applies to those who violate it, especially those who
shoot in demonstrations, marches, or populated areas. Another important task
the security apparatus performs is the apprehension of collaborators who
help the enemy in assassinating the Intifada activists. Security forces are
not supposed to carry out political arrests." This is a far cry from the
"cease-fire" envisioned in Tenet's plan.]
Sharon's Instinctive Aggression
www.fateh.net/e_editor/01/300601.htm
It can be said that the successive American administrations have made a
number of foolish acts out of arrogance in their attempts to impose their
hegemony during the cold war era or during their involvement in the frozen
Middle East peace process. However, the craziest act lies in the
unprecedented awkwardness that the US Administration experienced following
Powel's visit to the area. In a press conference he had with President
Arafat, Powel expressed his support for the idea of having international
observers to ensure that a period of quiet can take hold. Few hours later,
he declared that the only person who can decide on whether such a period has
been reached is Sharon - an act that legitimized Sharon's aggression.
Many analysts believed that after seven months of reluctance and after the
expiration of the one hundred day period that Sharon was granted to finish
the Intifada and impose his version of security, the US new involvement in
the Arab Israeli conflict will be more balanced to ensure security for all
people in the area. A similar policy was adopted by the Clinton
administration but proved unsuccessful because it failed to consider the
real situation.
Sharon's last meeting with Bush revealed some differences in their
perception of the situation. Powel was sent to the area to explore that
situation and report on the commitment of Israel and the PNA to the
implementation of both Tenet's paper and Mitchell's report.
Unfortunately, Powel's statements emphasized one important thing: the US is
fully biased to Israel. In fact, one can conclude that the US activated its
role only to blackmail the Palestinian leadership into making further
concessions. The US seems to be rewarding a war criminal who is aggressive
by instinct.
It has become clear that the direct and indirect pressure the US placed on
the Palestinian leadership to accept the Tenet's paper aimed to frighten the
Palestinian people into accepting Sharon's dictates. Such an attempt,
however, failed to produce the desired results when the Palestinian
leadership refused to sign the paper. The US attempt was aborted due to the
steadfastness that the Palestinian civil society and the National and
Islamic forces have shown.
Despite the reservations the Palestinian leadership made regarding Tenet's
paper, the US took another step in supporting Sharon's aggression. Mitchell'
s report was torn into pieces when the US agreed to his demand that the
political issue can only be tackled after a cease-fire takes hold. Sharon's
definition of a cease-fire includes throwing stones, peaceful marches,
playing the national anthem or even saying Jerusalem belongs to us.
The US partiality towards Sharon reinforces his aggressive nature and allows
his soldiers and flocks of settlers to go on with their assault against
Palestinians and their property. This irresponsible attitude on behalf of
the US requires Arabs and Muslims to stand against whatever pressures that
may be exerted to blackmail us. Also, we need to strengthen our home front
against any possible attacks, not forgetting the supportive role
institutions in both the Arab and Islamic world can play in this regard.
After all, the Israeli aggression is not confined to historic Palestine but
goes as far as Lebanon and Syria.
Accepting this situation turns Sharon's aggression into an instrument in the
hands of the Republican administration that needs to create a state of
permanent tension in order to impose its hegemony on the area. To undermine
this strategy, we should exercise cautioun and prepare ourselves for the
worst options without panic. Panic only leads to surrender. Caution, on the
other hand, prepares the way for using all sources in fighting the Israeli
occupation and the US bias. We have to make it clear to the US
administration that Sharon's aggression threatens its vital interests in the
Arab and Muslim world.
As Palestinians and as members of Fateh, we realize the importance of a
unified position that we share with Arabs and Muslims all over the world.
Importance, however, should be given to cementing our home front that should
include: the organizations of the civil society, the military, security and
civil institutions of the PNA, and the National and Muslim forces. When we
act as spearhead of the confrontation against Sharon, we will secure Arab
and Muslim support.
After nine months of perseverance and resolution, the Intifada has proven
that national unity remains an effective shield against the American
pressure, the reckless settlers, and the Israeli army. To maintain such a
situation, it is necessary to scrutinize our Intifada before the end of its
first year. This scrutinization is be based on the political and strategic
considerations that specify the goals of the Intifada, and it aims to
enhance the methods it has been using to achieve its goals.
National and Muslim forces should focus their attention on strengthening our
national unity. To ensure this, the burden of the Intifada ought to be
distributed in a way that ensures the participation of all sectors, each
according to its capacity. Each sector of the community should feel that it
is an integral part of the Intifada that seeks freedom and national
independence by achieving the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people:
the right of the refugees to return to the homes they were driven out from,
self-determination, and the establishment of the Palestinian state with
Jerusalem as its capital.
These principles constitute a struggle program that should be adhered to.
Such a program unifies all forces inside and outside Palestine in their
efforts to bring about a change in the US position by placing pressure on
Arab governments.
Based on its understanding of the importance of the role of the
organizations of the civil society, the National and Islamic forces insist
on the participation of representatives from these organizations in the
decision making process. This helps in unifying decisions taken at the level
of all governorates in Palestine regarding the functions and activities to
be carried out.
The involvement of the civil society in the Intifada activities shows the
world the peaceful nature of the protests being carried out against the
occupation. Areas of cooperation between the PNA institutions and those of
the civil society such as municipalities, village councils, public
federations, and trade unions have been specified.
It has also become clear that organizing the daily needs of the people is a
basic element in the continuation of the Intifada and its development until
it achieves its goals. Emphasis has been placed on supporting PNA
institutions that offer public services that influence the daily life of the
Palestinian individual. Therefore, full coordination is made with the
ministries that deal with health, education, social affairs, and labor.
National and Islamic forces also coordinate with the security forces to
provide an atmosphere of safety for the citizens. Security forces also
ensure that the law applies to those who violate it, especially those who
shoot in demonstrations, marches, or populated areas. Another important task
the security apparatus performs is the apprehension of collaborators who
help the enemy in assassinating the Intifada activists. Security forces are
not supposed to carry out political arrests.
A campaign of social solidarity should be launched to extend help to
families that are directly or indirectly harmed by the Israeli
practices -families of the martyrs and the injured or families that have
their houses demolished or one or more of its members captured by the
Israeli army. In this regard, solidarity groups in the Arab and Muslim world
should be activated to offer the necessary assistance to these families.
A united Palestinian position elicits a united Arab and Islamic stance that
supports the Palestinian struggle against Sharon who has an instinct for
aggression. This aggression threatens not only the historic Palestine but
also the whole Arab world. It is our duty to prove to the world that our
conflict with Israel is between the instinct of faith and righteousness and
that of aggression and injustice.
Revolution until victory.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Go to
the Israel Resource
Review homepage
The Israel Resource Review is brought to you by
the Israel Resource, a media firm based at the Bet Agron Press Center in
Jerusalem, and the Gaza Media Center under the juristdiction of the Palestine
Authority.
You can contact us on media@actcom.co.il.
|