|
Israel Resource Review |
30th July, 2001 |
Contents:
Official Fatah Editorial: Continue the War
Official Fatah Editorial: Demand complete Israeli withdrawal - including
Jerusalem, return of refugees, attack settlers, soldiers . . .
|
[IMRA Commentary: As Oslo
supporters push a
revisionist history to excuse Arafat for the failure of the Camp
David and Taba Talks and Yossi Beilin celebrates the latest
Palestinian-Israeli "joint declaration" (explaining that it
doesn't matter what the Palestinian REALLY think/plan - just
what they sign), Yasser Arafat's own official Fatah website
leaves no question that the goals are far beyond what Beilin
envisions: complete withdrawal from easern Jerusalem and the
return of refugees to within Israel.
The editorial also approves attacks against settlers and soldiers AND
attacks within the Green Line if Israel continues to attack.]
Rejection and Imposition
The Intifada broke out in September 2000, following the obnoxious visit of Sharon
to al Aqsa mosque. The visit was seen as an Israeli attempt to impose
surrender on the Palestinian people and their leadership. One should
remember that the visit took place after the Camp David summit at which
President Arafat rejected a proposal that the Israelis supposed would end
the Arab Israeli conflict. The Intifada proved that Palestinian
steadfastness and resolution would never wither away. The PNA and the
National and Islamic Forces have managed to activate all the institutions of
the civil society in the battle against the Israeli occupation.
At the beginning, the Intifada did not need a specific program in order to
show the Palestinian rejection of the Israeli US attempts to impose Clinton'
s proposals. The violations the proposals made against the international
legality were listed in our December 31,2000 edition of our bulletin (the
Fateh bulletin).
Following is a summary of these violations: Clinton's proposals
- Denied the Palestinian refugees the right to return to their properties
in line with UN Resolution 194;
- Allowed Israel to Judaize and annex the Arab city of Jerusalem which was
occupied in 1967. This contradicts UN Resolutions 242 252;
- Allowed Israel to annex occupied territories, and this violates UN
Resolutions 242 and 338;
- Legitimized the presence of Israeli settlements. This violates UN
Resolution 486, which considers these settlements illegal and an obstacle on
the path to peace;
- Accepted Israel's plan to divide al Aqsa Mosque and approved of what
Israel did to al Haram al Ibrahimi in Hebron. These acts threaten the Arab
character of the Christian and Islamic holy sites.
The Intifada has gone beyond the idea of rejecting the Zionist proposals and
it should now answer the questions that many people raise. These include:
Where is the Intifada heading? What is the Intifada's program from the
perspective of the National and Islamic Forces?
Some people believe that the Intifada has already proved that the
Palestinian people will never succumb to the Israeli will, and this helps in
improving our negotiating position. Therefore, further bloodshed in the
confrontation with Israel will not lead anywhere. Another group of people,
on the other hand, believe that we should seize the historic opportunity
the Intifada has provided to achieve our strategic goal, the liberation of
all historic Palestine by liquidating the Zionist entity at the military,
political, economic and cultural levels. While the first group failed to
value the determination of their people, the second underestimated the enemy
that receives the full support of the US.
Since the beginning of the Intifada, the National and Islamic Forces have
agreed on a number of principles that govern the Intifada's political
discourse and attract the consensus of all factions. Each faction, however,
is allowed to express its own strategic line separately or in cooperation
with other factions.
The National and Islamic Forces have been carrying out joint activities that
are usually announced in a central statement. These activities aim to unify
the efforts of all factions. For this purpose, the Central Coordination
Committee and the Higher Follow-up Committee have been established in the
West Bank and Gaza respectively. There has been a general feeling that
popular activities are decreasing. This is due to the absence of the
organizational bases that govern the work of the popular forces in the
institutions of both the PNA and the civil society such as trade unions,
commerce and industry chambers, societies and clubs.
In their latest meetings, the National and Islamic Forces have
differentiated between two types of working programs: the first one includes
activities that are a mere reaction to the Zionist aggression against our
people. The second includes activities aimed at the origin of the
aggression, i.e. Israel's occupation and its settlement policy. The first
type of activities consists of spontaneous popular gatherings in the proper
time and place. However, the second type of activities that should have a
direct influence on the occupation and settlers, requires the specification
of a clear political line that motivates the people to play a basic role in
the Intifada when they feel the tangible results of the confrontation.
In addition to having a clear political line, securing people's
participation requires an organizational line that regulates the
relationship of the National and Islamic Forces with the organized popular
forces and the PNA institutions. This will help clarify the positions of all
parties and in return bring us closer to achieving our goals. As to the
military line, it needs the effective participation of the leaders and the
competent cadre of all factions.
A clear political line of a working program should be based on the
commitment of all factions to the following goals:
- The cessation of Sharon's escalating aggression that aims to impose the
Zionist security perception;
- The removal of settlers and settlements;
- The withdrawal of Israeli forces from all occupied territories including
East Jerusalem;
- The return of refugees to their homes;
- The actualization of national independence and the establishment of our
sovereign state with Jerusalem as its capital.
Also, the international demand that Israel cease the construction of new
settlements, puts an end to one of the basic tenants of the Zionist
movement. However, this does not achieve our goal, i.e. the removal of all
settlements from our land. Two things need to be done to achieve this goal.
The PNA should continue to warn the world against this flagrant violation of
agreements it has signed. Secondly, further coordination need to be made
between the PNA and the National and Islamic Forces to find the proper ways
of confronting the confiscation of our land.
A clear organizational structure should be worked out to illustrate
relationships among the parties involved in the Intifada. Tanzim sites,
popular committees, and resistance and self-defense committees should be
linked to the areas committees. These in turn are linked to the regions
committees that are linked to the Central Coordination Committee.
A larger participation in the Intifada activities will be secured when
members from all factions seriously shoulder their responsibilities.
The organizational structure of the Intifada should complement that of the
PNA. The different committees of supplies, civil defense, emergency, social
solidarity, information and culture, and popular defense should coordinate
with the ministries that offer similar services.
To run the affairs of the Intifada, specify its requirements and follow up
its decisions, an independent organizational structure should be
established. Such a structure could take the form of a small committee or a
secretariat that deals with the Intifada not only at the local level but
also through communicating with solidarity committees that have been formed
through the Arab & Muslims world and in other countries. An Intifada
secretariat will also carry out information campaigns to remove all the
distortions that Zionist organizations have been spreading against us.
As to the working program of the military resistance, we should be careful
not to give the Intifada a military character. Militarization serves the
Israeli ends, since it takes away the popular character of the Intifada and
allows the Israelis to depict themselves as victims rather than aggressors.
The Israeli army and settlers constitute legitimate targets because their
presence violates the UN resolutions. Hitting such targets will have its
effects on the Israelis who should realize the high price they have to pay
for occupying another people and settling in their land. The Palestinians,
after all, should be able to deter Israel from using its F16 fighter jets.
In fact, if Israel continues to attack targets in the PNA-controlled areas,
it will be permissible to hit targets inside Israel proper. Under pressure,
the Israeli society should eventually call for the withdrawal of their army
and the dismantling of their settlements.
While the Intifada is approaching its second year, it is necessary to
maintain its achievements at the top which are national unity, the
complementing roles of the PNA and the National and Islamic Forces, and the
revival of the Palestinian resistance spirit. However, creativity remains
essential for opining up new horizons for the Intifada.
Revolution until victory.
Issued on July 28, 2001 and available at:
www.fateh.net/e_editor/01/150701.htm
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
President Arafat Received the Letter of Credentials of the new German Ambassador
And the German Ambassador Lauded PLO Ambitions
GAZA - July 28 - WAFA
(Official Palestine News Agency) - President Yasser
Arafat received in His Headquarters in Gaza this morning, the credential
letter of Mr. Andreas Reinieke, the new German representative to the PNA.
|
Source:
www.wafa.pna.net/EngText/28-07-2001/page001.htm
"I want to tell you that I am very happy and grateful to meet you as the new
representative of the German government to the Palestinian Authority and to
all the Palestinian people". The President said.
"The Foreign Minister Joshka Fischer who you know very well and he knows you
very well has specifically asks me to convey his best wishes and personal
warm wishes for yourself and for the people of Palestine", said Mr.
Reinieke.
" I am very happy to be here in this beautiful country, this is the country
where Palestinian people live since many centuries, your fathers, your
grandfathers, your grand father have already seen the beautiful seaside, the
beautiful shore, they have planted olive trees in the beautiful country and
you have made a difficult decision to share this lovely land with other
people. I know this is a difficult task, I know you have a very difficult
task, I wish you for fulfillment of dream of your people to live one day in
your own liable, free democratic state and in peace and mutual respect with
all of your neighbors", he added.
"You have a big task beside it is difficult, but it is difficult task you
have chosen and a lot of problems, and a lot of obstacles behind you, and of
course before you.
I assure you Mr. President with a good hand and Leadership that you have
achieved this aim for benefit of your country" Mr. Reinieke concluded.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Arafat Negotiates with Hamas
Ronny Shaked
Senior Arabic Affairs Correspondent, Yediot Aharonot
Will Have to Compromise With Hamas
Yedioth Ahronoth (p. B9) by Roni Shaked -- Gaza, unlike the West Bank, is a
powder-keg for Arafat too. Hamas has been flourishing, especially in the
past few months, thanks to the socio-economic distress there, and has begun
to pose a threat to Arafat. The activities of welfare organizations and
the help of Islamic charity funds has made them an alternative to the PA.
Thus, for example, Hamas summer camps --an entire month with two meals a
day, lessons in English, computers, and weapons training, along with
tradition and religion -- cost only ten shekels in Gaza.
Gaza is not homogenous. Despite the cooperation between the various
organizations since the beginning of the Intifada, there are still many
pockets, like Rafah, where Arafat has no control. The opposition
organizations feel stronger there, with wider public support, and do not
always fulfill agreements and understandings. After the Dolphinarium
attack, Arafat held many meetings with Hamas and managed to convince them
to coordinate their military actions with him. But in the past three
weeks, Hamas, along with operatives of the new 'Popular Resistance'
organization, has started firing mortars from Gaza into Israeli territory.
The PA reaction: Ghazi Jabali and soldiers from Moussa Arafat's (the
Rais's cousin) Military Intelligence erected roadblocks in order to arrest
the operatives of Hamas and the Popular Resistance. The result: gun
battles at one of the roadblocks and the wounding of three members of the
Popular Resistance. The atmosphere began heating up. On Monday there were
marches and a protest in Gaza against Arafat's security coordination with
Israel. Protesters marched on the Burij police station and tried to take
it over. Palestinian police officers succeeded in repelling them. The
protesters changed direction, marched to the house of Moussa Arafat, fired
at his car and his house, and engaged in gun battles with his bodyguards
and reinforcements from the PA security organizations. Only after
midnight, when the security organizations cut off the flow of electricity
to Gaza, did the shooting stop.
Arafat, who was in the Persian Gulf at the time, received reports of the
loss of control and immediately returned to Gaza to deal with the problem.
This incident can indeed teach us much about the fragility of the internal
stability of Gaza. Arafat can use his armed forces against Hamas, but his
problem is that today most of the public supports Hamas and its policy of
terror attacks. An opinion poll conducted this week in the territories
revealed that 95% of the population of Gaza supports military actions
against settlers and soldiers in the territories, and 65% supports terror
actions inside Israel.
Therefore, Arafat has no choice but to resolve his conflict with Hamas.
He must compromise in order to preserve national unity and avoid an
internal crisis. And compromise with Hamas has clear significance: a green
light for escalating the struggle against Israel.
This article ran in Yediot Aharonot, July 27th, 2001
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Arafat's New Army
Ronny Shaked
Senior Arabic Affairs Correspondent, Yediot Aharonot
On Tuesday, a
few hours after Yuri Gushtzin was murdered and his body dumped
near the slaughterhouse in Ramallah, the "el-Aksa Martyrs
Brigades," the military arm of Fatah, took responsibility for
the murder.
|
The announcement was no different from dozens of press releases published in recent months with the signature of the organization, taking responsibility for shooting attacks, bombs, mortar fire and other murderous actions. Since the beginning of the Intifada the el-Aksa Martyrs Brigades have played a vital role in leading the armed struggle against Israel. On the West Bank, in the Gaza Strip and inside the Green Line, some 6,000 terror attacks were carried out in this period, the decisive majority of them by the el-Aksa Martyrs Brigades.
The name of the commander of the organization, which has established
itself as the central military wing of the Fatah movement, is Haj Abu
Ahmad. Israel's intelligence arms have no picture of Haj Abu Ahmad, nor do
they have any other identifying details. There are those who say that he
is hiding in Nablus, while others say that he is abroad, pulling the
strings of terror from there. Hussam Khadr, one of the leaders of the
Tanzim in the Balata refugee camp, says that Abu Ahmad is nothing more than
an invention of Israeli Intelligence.
The mystery that surrounds the identity of the commander Abu Ahmad,
reveals much about the organization's operational methods. Maximum
secrecy, compartmentalization of underground cells, operations in small
groups, cruel acts of terror, and the most significant point: unconditional
and unquestioning loyalty to Yasser Arafat. For them, he is the source of
authority for carrying out acts of terror.
For Arafat, the el-Aksa Martyrs Brigades are a central tool in
controlling the height of the flames of the Intifada. They don't need to
receive an explicit directive from him in order to decrease or escalate the
level of terror attacks. They know how to translate the Rais's body
language, his expressions, his tone and the meaning of his words, into the
rhythm of bursts of Kalachnikov fire.
Dahlan and Tirawi Sign Up
A few days after the outbreak of the Intifada, when developments already
pointed at long-term fighting, Arafat needed an extra-governmental military
wing not identified with the Palestinian Authority institution, which would
be loyal to his policies, obey his orders, receive wide support on the
Palestinian street and, most importantly, would be strong enough to fight
against the settlers and IDF soldiers. The goal of the establishment of
this organization was to consolidate all of the Fatah fighters under the
new framework in order to improve the fighting capability of the
Palestinians in the armed struggle against Israel.
The military core group of Fatah, the movement headed by Arafat,
answered all of these criteria. The process of building the el-Aksa
Martyrs Brigades took several months. In an attempt to give the new body a
measure of operational momentum, and thus also turn up the level of the
Intifada a few notches, Arafat allowed his security organizations --
Mohammed Dahlan, commander of the Palestinian GSS in Gaza, and Tawfiq
Tirawi, commander of General Intelligence in the West Bank -- to join the
fighting under the umbrella of the el-Aksa Martyrs Brigades.
The organization was established in stages, not in one fell swoop. The
first shot was fired in Nablus, on October 12, 2000, during a military
parade attended by several hundred Fatah members armed with a wide range of
weapons: pistols, rifles, sub-machine guns, and hand grenades. In a
ceremony held at the end of the parade, the establishment of the "armed
militias" was announced. Three or four days later, announcements were
already being released, signed by the el-Aksa Martyrs Brigades. After
Nablus came Ramallah, Gaza, Khan Yunis, Hebron, Bethlehem and other cities
in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Fighting cells were also established in
towns under Israeli security control. The process of establishing a firm
base for the organization took several months. Today, the organization
already includes most of Fatah's fighting activists.
The Language of the Rifle
In September of 1993, after the historic handshake between Arafat and
Rabin on the White House lawn in Washington, Fatah announced a halt to its
armed actions against Israel. Contrary to Israeli expectations, Arafat did
not turn Fatah into a political party, instead building the movement as a
popular organization with military characteristics in order to provide him
with a lever to bring out the masses for confrontations with Israel, and
also to use in armed struggle when the time came. So it was, for example,
during the Tunnel Riots of September 1996, the Nakba Day riots of May 2000
and, of course, in the el-Aksa Intifada.
In contradiction to the agreements, which required Arafat to confiscate
illegal weapons, he did not disarm Fatah. On the contrary, he provided it
with weapons and ammunition from PA warehouses, and PA officers trained
cadres of fighters from among Fatah youth.
Military power was kept decentralized, in separate groups on a local
level, mainly in the refugee camps. Arafat did not fight against them, and
forgave them when they attacked the PA or when they acted like street
hoodlums.
Immediately after the establishment of the PA, many groups of veteran
Fatah fighters were posted to the intelligence organizations commanded by
Rajoub, Dahlan, or Tirawi, but their loyalty was and still is to the mother
movement, Fatah.
When the Intifada broke out, it was easy to establish the el-Aksa
Martyrs Brigades on this base. And since the outbreak of fighting, Fatah
has renewed, widened and broadened the base of its military wing. The call
was easily answered: these are fighters who wanted to show their abilities
and military power, fighters who are loyal to Fatah ideology, and who
believe that the peace process has failed. [ . . . ]
A week ago the el-Aksa Martyrs Brigades released a pamphlet detailing the
ideology that guides them: "The ten hungry years of the peace process
proved that the Zionist occupation that disturbs the heart of the
Palestinian homeland understands nothing but the language of rifles and
fire and the language of revolution and the bullets of the revolutionary
fighters. Jerusalem is Arab and Muslim land and not one grain of its soil
can be given up. The return of the refugees to their homes is the heart of
the problem and its foundation, and any concession on their rights is
considered treachery. Unity is the main gate to the liberation of
Palestine." [ . . . ]
According to Israeli assessments, the el-Aksa Martyrs Brigades include
several hundred active fighters; of those only a few dozen are in the
operational cells which are carrying out the shooting attacks and planting
bombs. The upkeep of such units requires a large amount of money for
salaries, vehicles, the purchase of weapons and ammunition, and operational
costs such as apartment rentals. The organization is believed to be funded
by the Palestinian Authority in the framework of the budget allocated to
Fatah.
The military wing of Fatah is at the height of a process of growth and
stabilization. This is an organized system that coordinates actions
between various sectors and transfers weapons from place to place. Thus,
for example, on July 2nd, terrorists of the el-Aksa Martyrs Brigades
carried out five attacks in various parts of the West Bank at almost the
same time, and the organization's headquarters took responsibility for the
attacks in one press release. The attacks were as follows: the murder of
Yair Har-Sinai at the settlement of Susya in the southern Hebron Hills, the
murder of Rabbi Aharon Abidayan in Baka el-Sharkiya, shooting at an IDF
position at the settlement of Beit El, the wounding of a settler at the
settlement of Bracha near Nablus, and the ambush of an IDF force in the
southern part of the village of Hawra near Nablus.
The el-Aksa Martyrs Brigades are also the base of a political force
which is growing in importance and developing its own agenda. The Brigades
receive wide support in the Palestinian public, almost a consensus. They
represent those who led the Oslo process and now oppose it, like the vast
majority of the Palestinian population. Whoever is crowned commander of
the organization will have a strong power base for future political action.
This article ran in Yediot Aharonot, July 27th, 2001
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Joint Statement of Israeli Peace Now and PLO
NO TO BLOODSHED, NO TO OCCUPATION
YES TO NEGOTIATIONS, YES TO PEACE
We, the undersigned Israelis and Palestinians, are meeting in the most
difficult of circumstances for both our peoples. We come together to call
for an end to bloodshed, an end to occupation, an urgent return to
negotiations and the realization of peace between our peoples. We refuse to
comply with the ongoing deterioration in our situation, with the growing
list of victims, the suffering and the real possibility that we may all be
drowned in a sea of mutual hostility.
|
We hereby raise our voices and implore all people of goodwill to return to
sanity, to re-discover compassion, humanity, and critical judgment and to
reject the unbearable ease of the descent into fear, hatred, and calls for
revenge.
In spite of everything we still believe in the humanity of the other side,
that we have a partner for peace and that a negotiated solution to the
conflict between our peoples is possible. Mistakes have been made on all
sides, the trading of accusations and pointing of fingers is not a policy
and is no substitute for serious engagement.
The impression that exists in both communities that 'time is on our side' is
illusory. The passage of time benefits only those who do not believe in
peace. The longer we wait, the more innocent blood will be spilt, the
greater will be the suffering and hope will be further eroded. We must move
urgently to re-build our partnership, to end the de-humanization of the
other, and to revive the option of a just peace that holds out promise for
our respective futures.
The way forward lies in international legitimacy and the implementation of
UNSCR 242 and 338 leading to a 2-State solution based on the 1967 borders,
Israel and Palestine living side-by-side, with their respective capitals in
Jerusalem. Solutions can be found to all outstanding issues that should be
fair and just to both sides and should not undermine the sovereignty of the
Palestinian and Israeli states as determined by their respective citizens,
and embodying the aspirations to statehood of both peoples, Jewish and
Palestinian. This solution should build on the progress made between
November 1999 and January 2001.
The immediate need is for the full and accurate implementation of the
Recommendations of the Mitchell Committee, including: the cessation of
violence, a total freeze on settlement activity, the implementation of
outstanding agreements and a return to negotiations. This process needs to
be monitored by an objective third party.
We see it as our duty to work together and each of us in their own
communities, to put a halt to the deterioration in our relations, to rebuild
trust, belief and the hope for peace.
Palestinian signatories: Yasser Abed Rabbo, Minister of Culture and
Information; Hisham Abdul-Razek, Minister of Detainees and Ex-Detainees
Affairs; Nabil Amr, Minister of Parliamentary Affairs; Dr. Hanan Ashrawi,
PLC Member, Secretary-General of the Palestinian Initiative for Global
Dialogue and Democracy ; Hakam Balawi, PLC Member; Dr. Sari Nuseibeh,
President, Al-Quds University; Dr. Gabi Baramki, Bir Zeit University; Hafez
al-Barghouti, Editor, al-Hayat al-Jadida Daily; Dr. Nazmi al-Ju'beh,
Director-General, Riwaq; Dr. Salim Tamari, Director, Institute for Jerusalem
Studies; Suleiman Mansour, Director, Al-Wasiti Art Center; Dr. Mahadi
Abdul-Hadi, director PASSIA; George Ibrahim, Director, Al-Qasaba Theater;
Sufian Abu-Zaideh, Deputy Minister, Ministry of Civil Affairs; Jamal Zaqout,
Director-General, Ministry of Civil Affairs; Sama'an Khoury,
Director-General, Palestine Media Center; Dr. Samir Abdallah, Director,
Pal-Trade; Samir Hulieleh, Manager, Nassar Investment Co.; As'ad al-As'ad,
Writer; Abdul-Rahman Awad, Writer; Samir Rantisi, Media Advisor to the
Minister of Culture and Information; Nisreen Haj-Ahmad, Lawyer; Rami
Shehaded, Lawyer; Ghaith Al-Omari, Lawyer
Israeli signatories: Dr. Janet Aviad, Peace Now; Chaim Oron, former
Minister, Meretz; Prof. Arie Arnon, Peace Now;
Yossi Beilin, former Minister, Labor; Prof. Menachem Brienker, Hebrew
University; Prof. Galia Golan, Peace Now;
David Grossman, author; Dr. Yossi Dahan; Prof. Moshe Halberthal, Hebrew
University; AB Yehoshua, author; Prof. Yirmyahu Yovel, Hebrew University;
Prof. Dan Yaacobson, Tel Aviv University; Prof. Ephi Ya'ar, Steinmatz
Institute for Peace; Daniel Levy, ECF; Ronit Matalon, author; Prof. Avishai
Margalit, Hebrew University; S. Yizhar, author; Prof. Sami Samuha, Haifa
University; Amos Oz, author; Ron Pundak, ECF, Peres Peace Center; Yair
Tsaban, Former Minister, Meretz;
Dr. Nissim Calderon; Prof. Ephraim Kleinman; Dr. Menachem Klein, Bar Ilan
University; Dr. Aviad Kleinberg; Adv. Tzali Reshef, Peace Now; Prof. Yuli
Tamir, former Minister, Labor
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
What is Happening on the Temple Mount - Tisha B'av 5761?
Nadav Shragai
Members of the "Committee to
Prevent Archaeological Destruction on the
Temple Mount" include A. B. Yehoshua, Amos Oz
and S. Yizhar, former justices Meir Shamgar and
Miriam Ben-Porat, as well as many archaeologists.
The committee constantly passes on reports about a continuing destruction of antiquities on the mount. Some of the reports have been confirmed, police have denied others, and some that police denied in the past have been proved true subsequently.
|
The politicians - neither in the days of the Barak administration nor
in the current one, have taken no steps to halt waqf construction activity.
Most of this is done without permission and all of it without archaeological supervision.
Antiquities Authority archaeologists were first kept away from the
Temple Mount in September 1996 after the opening of the northern entrance to the Hasmonean Tunnel by the Netanyahu government. For a few months in 1999,the Barak government managed to get some supervision by the Antiquities Authority back onto the mount, but that was halted in October 2000 when the Intifada broke out.
Since last Rosh Hashana, the Temple Mount has been closed to both
Antiquities Authority people and indeed to anyone who is not Muslim, except
for the Israeli police, which continue to patrol the area at various levels
of intensity. It is not clear if the police are conducting ongoing systematic surveillance of the underground construction work by the waqf and the Israeli Islamic Movement. The only significant difference that came following the election of the Sharon government is that the decision to prevent Muslims from bringing additional construction material onto the mount is generally being enforced.
The opposition to Israel's policy of ignoring what is happening on the
mount with regard to the destruction of antiquities comes from both within
the establishment and from outside it. Attorney General Elyakim Rubinstein,
who in the past called the activity on the mount "a kick at the history of
the Jewish people," sent some vociferous letters to former prime minister
Ehud Barak and has made his views known to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
The Antiquities Authority occasionally protests about the construction
work. The former director general of the authority, Amir Drori, called the
work in the Solomon's Stables area "an archaeological crime." But the
positions taken by both Rubinstein and Drori have been rejected time and
again.
The main worry at the political level is of a confrontation between the
security forces and thousands of Muslims, which would spread to far beyond
the Temple Mount - to Jerusalem, the territories and possibly to other Arab
states. But there are those in both the police and Shin Bet who are skeptical of those concerns.
Various petitions to the High Court, both by the public committee and
the various veteran Temple Mount organizations, have been rejected. The court has made clear that the issue is the responsibility of the politicians and it has no intention of intervening. The court usually refrains from getting into the details of the controversy between the police and the Temple Mount organizations.
For the past two years no journalists have been allowed on the mount
except for those whom the waqf approves as sympathetic to the waqf's cause.
Visits to the mount are nearly impossible and photography is strictly
forbidden.
This article ran in HaAretz on July 29, 2001
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Will US Military Observers Return in Body Bags?
David Bedein
During US Secretary of State Colin Powell's June 28th visit to
Israel, Powell announced that the US would dispatch military "observers" to oversee implementation of US-brokered accords between Israel and the PLO. On July 27th, two days before the Tisha B'Av fast that marks the conquest and destruction of Jerusalem, the new US ambassador, a Jewish American,. Daniel Kurtzer, was reported to be in the final stages of preparing the final draft for the deployment of US troops in Israel.
|
These US troops would patrol Jerusalem and Judea, also known as the west bank, all defined by the US as "occupied" by Israel.
Since US state department policy makers have determined that Jews have no sovereignty in Jerusalem or the west bank, US observers would be expected to show little respect for the concerns of Jews who live in these areas.
All this follows confirmed reports that the US has been training the security forces of the PLO, even at a time when the PLO has declared war on the state and people of Israel, soldiers and civilians alike, especially in Jerusalem and Judea.
US troops, even in the form of "observers", would be an invading army, following in the footsteps of the British, who were awarded a mandate over Palestine by the League of Nations in the 1920's and expelled by the new Jewish state during its War of Independence. 1945-1948
To the surprise of many, the US does recognize any part of Jerusalem as part of Israel, west or east. Any birth certificate, passport or legal document issued by the US Consul in Jerusalem reads "Jerusalem", with no designated nation state mentioned.
The US state department maintains the policy that it adopted in 1948, which is that the Jerusalem -Bethlehem region must become an international city, when it was slated to be administered by the US under a UN trusteeship
Indeed, UN negotiator Count Folk Bernadotte was shot to death by Israeli Jews in September, 1948 in Jerusalem, he was in the final stages of negotiating that American plan to transfer '"greater Jerusalem" to a US trusteeship. The US had already selected a Mayor for Jerusalem, a Quaker prelate from Philadelphia.
The Swedes have never forgiven Israelis for killing Bernadotte.
Luck would have it that Bernadotte was not a US diplomat.
The US never abandoned the plan that Bernadotte was negotiating for Jerusalem when he was killed.
While Jewish religious law forbids Jews to raise a hand against an Israeli soldier, Jewish religious law would not forbid a Jew from resisting a soldier from a foreign army in Jerusalem or Judea.
Jewish Americans, amongst others, would be in for quite a shock if US troops fall at the hands of Israeli resistance fighters.
It is not too late for US public opinion to reconsider the idea of dispatching US military "observers" to Israel.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Go to
the Israel Resource
Review homepage
The Israel Resource Review is brought to you by
the Israel Resource, a media firm based at the Bet Agron Press Center in
Jerusalem, and the Gaza Media Center under the juristdiction of the Palestine
Authority.
You can contact us on media@actcom.co.il.
|