|Israel Resource Review
||12th March, 2002
Whither the Saudi Initiative? A Balloon Bursts
Yedioth Ahronoth (p. 2) by Sever Plotzker -- The more time that passes, the
more feathers are plucked from the "Saudi initiative" -- the informal plan
of Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah for "complete" Israeli-Arab peace.
But prior to a serious debate about the ever-changing substance of this
initiative, there are a few things worth knowing about Saudi Arabia.
Between the years 1974 and 2001 the small Saudi Arabian kingdom sold
petroleum and its products at a total sum of 1,300 billion dollars. Or in
words: One-thousand three hundred billion dollars.
These legendary oil revenues were not invested in developing the
country. Product per capita in Saudi Arabia dropped from 29,000 dollars
annually in 1980 to 7,400 dollars this year. Unemployment skyrocketed to 16
percent. Education on all levels is crude and behind the times. There are
no good universities in Saudi Arabia, no research institutes, no culture.
There is no hi-tech. No army. Industry and agriculture are losing
enterprises that are subsidized.
So where is the money? It was stolen and divvied up by the members of
the royal house. According to estimates made by Merril Lynch, the financial
assets held by the wealthy Saudis outside its borders amount to 1,000
billion dollars. 1,000 billion dollars.
Five percent of the Saudi wealth would solve not only the destitution of
all the Palestinian refugees, but could also lay the foundation for the
existence of a prosperous Palestinian economy for generations to come. But
what do the princes in the Saudi court care about the fate of their
brethren who wallow in the camps?
Saudi Arabia remains a corrupt medieval kingdom in which the rich play
with their technological gadgets and hold their assets safe in foreign
banks. There is no democracy in Saudi Arabia, no equal rights, no civil
legal system. It is no surprise that it is ruled by a crown-prince who
would have been convicted in any court in the enlightened world of the
crime of bigamy.
Nothing prepares him and his ilk to initiate an Israeli-Palestinian
Saudi Arabia revises its initiative: No more normalization
Yedioth Ahronoth (p. 2) by Smadar Peri -- The Saudi Arabians are now
offering less to Israel in return to a full withdrawal to the 1967 borders.
From now on there is no talk of full normalization. Instead, Israel is
being offered complete , but "frozen" peace.
This clarification was presented by Saudi Arabia in the meeting of Arab
foreign ministers that was held yesterday in Cairo in advance of the Arab
League summit meeting in Beirut at the end of March. Political sources said
that full peace would mean formal diplomatic relations and nothing more.
Conversely, normalization also includes trade relations, tourism and visits
-- which is something that most Arab leaders are averse to.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher lowered expectations yesterday
when he defined the Saudi peace initiative as "ideas" and stressed that
"there are a few initiatives now, among which are the Saudi ideas."
These articles appeared on March 11, 2002 in Yediot Aharonot
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Israeli Press Analyis of the Terror Attack on Israel's Northern Road
Terror Returns to the Galilee
Ma'ariv (p. 2) by Avi Ashkenazi et al. -- Terror returned to the
Galilee. As a result of shots from an ambush near Kibbutz Metzuba, six
Israelis were killed, including a mother and daughter, an IDF officer and
another three civilians. Two terrorists were killed, and by last night, it
was still not clear whether a third terrorist had fled, after footprints of
another person were found in the area. The Fatah military wing, the El-Aksa
Martyrs Brigades, claimed yesterday, "A Palestinian cell that infiltrated
from Lebanon" carried out the terror attack.
At about 12:30 p.m. the terrorists stationed themselves on a hill about
three and a half kilometers from the Lebanese-Israel border. They shot to
death a shepherd from Moshav Betzet, Ofer Kanerik. Afterwards they fired at
a number of vehicles, including a Subaru in which a mother and her
15-year-old daughter, Lynn and Atara Livne, were traveling, and another
private vehicle in which Yehudit Cohen of Shlomi was traveling. The three
women were killed.
Then they shot at another two vehicles and a public bus on its way from
Safed to Nahariya carrying a driver and a passenger. The passenger was
slightly injured. The bus driver managed to get away and drive the bus to
nearby Kibbutz Metzuba.
Afterwards the terrorist killed the driver of a truck transporting
earth: A single bullet penetrated the window and hit him. The sixth dead
person is Lt. German Rojyakov, killed while storming the terrorists.
Yitzhak Friedman, 68, from Moshav Betzet, saw two figures walking near
his orchard yesterday at about 8:30 a.m.: "They wore IDF uniforms and had
M-16 rifles, but no helmets. I think that one of them had reddish hair. I
said hello to them, they were about 20 meters from me, but they continued
to walk and didn't even look at me. I was very lucky they didn't shoot me."
Policeman Ilan Cohen from the Nahariya police was on his way to the
police station for the afternoon shift when he heard the shooting. "He
immediately left his car and was the first to return fire at the
terrorists. In essence, he kept them covered until the first police cars
arrived a few minutes later," related a senior police officer from the
northern district. After a short gun battle, Cohen was injured in his foot
and fell bleeding in the middle of the road.
IDF forces arrived. These were Nahal forces manning the outpost at
nearby Rosh Hanikra. They stormed the terrorist in an open area while
firing volleys and climbing the hill. Brigade Commander Col. Dror Rofeh
killed the two terrorist in a face to face battle. The deputy commander was
killed while covering for him.
The driver of the regional council truck, Eli Ohana of Shlomi said: "I
was just about to unload the truck at the banana fields under the hill, and
then fire was opened at me. I was able to see one of the soldiers shooting
at me very clearly, he wore army clothes and webbing. It was frightening.
I don't know where I got the strength, but I jumped out of the window of
the truck and lay on the ground so as not to be hit."
The terrorists used a weapon with a silencer during their attack so as
to make it difficult to discern their location. This became clear
yesterday in the investigation.
Execution: Palestinians; Planning: Hizbullah
Yedioth Ahronoth (p. 1) by Alex Fishman (news analysis) -- Yesterday's
attack in the Western Galilee was a joint production: The voice was that of
Hizbullah, but the hands were Palestinian.
The findings have not received final confirmation so far, but the
picture that is emerging points to an attack carried out by Palestinians,
members of Islamic Jihad, who trained in Hizbullah bases in the Bekaa
Valley in Lebanon and were sent by Hizbullah to carry out a quality attack
inside the Green Line.
The two Palestinians apparently crossed the Lebanese border without
triggering the fence's warning systems. This is a very worrisome
possibility, one which has operational ramifications for the functioning of
the Northern Command along the border in the future. The Northern Command
will have to discover the method that the organizers of the attack found to
penetrate the fence without being discovered. Until then, more forces will
have to be concentrated along the fence. In Gaza, too, the terrorists have
found ways of getting through the fence. In one of the most recent
attacks, near Kissufim -- in which a Givati soldier was killed -- it turned
out that the terrorists simply hopped over the fence using a ladder. And
information of this sort no doubt moves between the various sectors.
It is believed that the two crossed the fence under cover of the attack
carried out by Hizbullah two days ago near Ghajar. We have seen this
before: Hizbullah draws the attention of the IDF to one sector and then
carries out an operation in another. The two had been inside the Green
Line since two nights ago. This is enough time to find a good lookout
point, follow activities in the area and comfortably choose the best target
Nothing that could identify them was found on their bodies, which only
strengthens the assumption that they were sent by professionals who want to
confuse the enemy. Because the moment that it becomes clear that this was
an attack carried out with Hizbullah involvement, Israel will have to deal
seriously with the matter and exact a painful price in order to prevent the
reoccurrence of such incidents in the future.
Hizbullah wants to kill two birds with one stone: to help their forlorn
brothers in Ramallah, as their secretary promised, and also to enjoy the
anonymity of the two unidentified Palestinians, to cause Israel confusion
and embarrassment and save itself from an Israeli counter-strike.
Israel must decide that it will no longer be the punching bag for every
leper and outcast in the Middle East. The minute that it is proven that
this was a cross-border infiltration, Israel should react immediately and
in strength, but not against Hizbullah. There is really no point in
getting into a war of attrition with Hizbullah and in opening a second
front. The target should be the Lebanese government and Syrian interests
in Lebanon. And it should be a blow so strong that Hariri will change his
mind about holding the meeting of the Arab League in Beirut.
Ma'ariv (p. 1) by Oded Granot (news analysis) -- The lethal terror attack
on the Shlomi-Metzuba road in the Western Galilee is marked with the
fingerprints of Hizbullah even if a breach in the border fence has not yet
been located, and as of last night, the identity of the terrorists is not
Hizbullah may have infiltrated perhaps even 24 hours ago and stayed
overnight in a hiding place, leaving to carry out the terror attack in the
light of day.
The terrorists might also have been a Palestinian cell from the
territories that was prepared and instructed by Nasrallah's men in Lebanon
for the operation.
And it might have been a Fatah cell from the Lebanese faction of the
El-Aksa Martyrs Brigades that trains in Lebanon with the aid of Hizbullah
in order to infiltrate and carry out terror attacks inside Israeli territory.
The important point is that Hizbullah recently made it its goal to heat
up the northern front by carrying out a large scale terrorist act and not
necessarily by firing Katyushas from Lebanese territory. Such a terror
attack fits in well with the organization's need to prove that it is active
militarily against Israel and that it is, in fact, keeping its promise to
help the Palestinian struggle in the territories, without directly
embroiling the government of Lebanon.
At least three Hizbullah spokesmen, led by Secretary General Hassan
Nasrallah, have stressed the urgent need to "go from words to deeds" in the
last two days. This need to inflame the armed confrontation between the
Palestinians and the Israelis has become more urgent on the eve of the
visit of American envoy Anthony Zinni to the region, who is coming here to
push for a cease-fire agreement. Hizbullah is not interested in a
cease-fire, just as Hamas and Islamic Jihad are not interested, and even
announced yesterday that it makes no difference if the Americans are
sending an envoy, the armed resistance must not stop.
And it is no accident that Hizbullah was one of the first groups in the
Arab world to express vehement opposition to the Saudi initiative for full
peace in exchange for a full withdrawal, and announced that Sharon should
not be offered a way out of the complicated situation he finds himself in.
If the assessment that Hizbullah was involved in the terror attack in
the north is found to be correct, this will indicate that the organization
is changing its methods of confrontation against Israel, which up to now
have been limited to shooting at IDF outposts on Har Dov, firing
anti-aircraft fire at IAF aircraft, efforts to recruit and operate cells to
carry out terror attacks from within the territories, and smuggle weapons
from Jordan and other places.
Such a change may be a Hizbullah attempt to provoke Israel to respond
militarily against them, which would then justify firing Katyushas at
northern communities and enable them to open another front against the IDF.
Mofaz: "Hizbullah wants to open a second front"
Ma'ariv (p. 4) by Avi Ashkenazi et al. -- "Hizbullah wants to carry out
terror attacks acts to show support and solidarity with the Palestinians
and to cause Israel to respond, which would lead to a conflagration on the
northern border," said Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Shaul Mofaz a short while
before the terror attack on the northern border. "There is no doubt that
Hizbullah, with the encouragement of Iran and Syria, wants us to respond in
such a manner that a second front is opened, while we are in the midst of a
campaign on the Palestinian front. We must act carefully and not be dragged
into such a situation," said Mofaz.
Yesterday senior security sources spoke about "cautious assessments"
that those who carried out the terror attack near Kibbutz Metzuba came from
inside Israel but were coordinated with Hizbullah. "It is not clear to us
from where the terrorists came. There were no signs of infiltration on the
border fence, but the proximity, as well as the fact that it was a
well-armed and well-trained force, raises the suspicion that it was an
infiltration from Lebanese territory," said a senior source.
A very senior source in the north pointed out, "If it turns out that
the terrorists infiltrated from Lebanese territory, it changes the whole
situation on the northern border and Israel will have to respond
powerfully. Therefore we are not in a hurry to say where the terrorists
came from, until we know the answer one hundred percent."
Defense Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer said yesterday: "It should be
clear that Hizbullah cannot fire one bullet in the air without Syria. But I
don't intend to bring about an escalation. As far as things are up to me,
the matter will remain an incident on the border."
The initial investigations carried out so far focus suspicions in two
main directions as to the identity of the terrorists: a Palestinian cell,
or an Israeli Arab cell.
At first, security establishment officials thought that Hizbullah was
behind the terror attack. According to this theory, the terrorists
infiltrated Israeli territory several days ago, maybe even on Monday, under
cover of the terror attack carried out at the IDF Lilach outpost north of
Maayan Baruch. However various examinations conducted along the electronic
fence did not reveal any indications of an infiltration from Lebanese
territory. Thus, senior officials tend to negate the possibility that a
Lebanese Hizbullah cell carried out the terror attack.
The suspicion that the terror attack came from Israeli territory is
based mainly on the clothing and equipment of the terrorists. The two were
dressed in IDF uniforms with webbing, and one of the weapons they were
carrying with them, an M-16 rifle, was IDF-issued. It is believed that the
equipment was stolen from the IDF (or sold by criminal elements), and
transferred to hostile elements in the PA or among Israeli Arabs.
Senior officials believe that Hizbullah was indirectly connected to the
attack, and possibly financed and trained the terrorists who operated near
Kibbutz Metzuba. This assessment is corroborated by the amount of effort
needed by Palestinian terrorist organizations to carry out a terror attack
so far from PA territory. "It is not clear why they made such an effort to
go so far, as from the minute the terrorists crossed the seamline, they
could have fired in crowed populations centers, without taking the risk of
getting caught on the way," a senior source said.
Lebanon officially claimed yesterday that the terror attack was not
carried out from its territory. The Hizbullah television station claimed
last night, "The fighters of the holy Intifada in PA territory succeeded in
deviating from their war inside the territories and going to northern
occupied Palestine, from where they attacked a bus and car near the
settlement of Shlomi."
Yedioth Ahronoth (p. 3) by Goel Beno -- Yitzhak Friedman, 67, a farmer from
Moshav Betzet, recounted that at 8:30 a.m. yesterday he saw the two
terrorists inside the moshav and thought that they were IDF soldiers.
"In the morning, I went to open the water pipe in the moshav. Suddenly
I heard the sound of someone stepping on dry leaves. Twenty meters from me
I saw two guys quickly crossing the road. I said, 'good morning, guys,'
because I thought that they were soldiers, and I continued on my way. One
had a Kalashnikov and one had a long M-16. I did not report it to the
police because they did not make me suspicious. It was a miracle that they
didn't shoot me. Later, when I arrived at the scene of the attack, I saw
on the bodies of the terrorists the weapons that I had seen in the morning."
Ma'ariv (p. 3) by Yaakov Erez -- The terror attack yesterday in the north
was a serious terror attack, but if it turns out that Hizbullah is behind
it, then its significance is even more serious: it will be the signal of
the beginning of a "second front," which is Arafat's dream and Israel's
As of last night, there was no irrefutable proof of any direct
involvement of Hizbullah in the terror attack. But recently, enough
evidence has accumulated that the organization indeed intends to again
ignite the northern front. First there was talk, arrogant threats by
Nasrallah and other senior organization officials. After that, a short
while later, two terrorists suddenly appeared on the main road near Shlomi.
It is not yet known where the terrorists came from. But it would be
reasonable to assume that they left on Monday night. Perhaps by chance, or
not by chance, there were shooting incidents on Monday night between
Hizbullah operatives and an IDF force near Maayan Baruch. Is there a
connection between the two events? As of last night, no evidence was found
of anyone crossing the border fence from Lebanon into Israel. But past
experience has proven that Hizbullah likes to open fire in one sector in
order to engage and distract, and to attack in another sector.
The details will become clear later. But there is no doubt that Arafat
is pleased with what happened yesterday in the north. Form his point of
view, especially when the IDF is absorbed in its operations in the
territories, searching Jabalya and occupying Ramallah, it is convenient
when a new threat develops and Israel is compelled to face two fronts and
split up its forces.
If it turns out that the terrorists came from the territories, and that
it was a Palestinian terror attack, it will be necessary to examine how
they made their way across such a great distance from Area A territories to
the northern border, whether they were aided by anyone and how they
stationed themselves at the point they chose for the lethal attack.
But if it turns out that Hizbullah's hands were pulling the strings,
directly or indirectly, then this is the horror scenario we've already been
through in the past, and whose realization could make Israel face a new
Press clips from Israeli media: March 13, 2002.
Translations courtesy of "israel news today"
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
A Wound for Life: My Son Caught in the Line of Fire at his Yeshiva
Nahum (Neal ) Bedein
You might want to sit down before you read this.
Gilad's school/"Mechinah" program in Atzmona in the Gush Katif (Gaza) area
was attacked Thursday night at approx. 11.30 p.m. A lone terrorist
came into the settlement right near the south eastern section near the
school. Mostly all of the 120 boys were in the "Beit Midrash" study hall as
Thursday nights they stay up most of the night learning. (Remember-- these
boys are not force to learn but do it for "torah l'shma" just for the sake
Unfortunately, two boys were out at their cabin. The terrorist killed them
first at point blank range. He then proceeded to the styudy hall. Luckily
another boy near the door thought he heard something and told everyone in
their section to get down and shut off the lights. Gilad says that he
looked outside and saw the terrorist heading for the study hall. Gilad, in
his 6ft 3in frame crept under his desk like the others. The terrorist went
straight in, and thank G-d, didn't notice the 70 boys on the floor. But, He
went towards the room on the end which was lit and the boys there didn't
know what to expect. The terrorist let off his m-16. The rabbi.teacher had a
gun and shot back. The Rabbi got 2 bullets in him. The terrorist threw a few
grenades. The carnage in that room totaled 3 boys dead with around 3 0
injured. The terrorist went out and was met by a local lt. col who killed
him in a chase.
Gilad called us at 11. 45 to tell us "I'm ok, but others are not". We
didn't know what he was talking about and put on the news on the radio and
tv. The incident made the news right away. Gilad called back at 12.30 and
told us of the gruesome details.
The next day, Friday, it was on the news. 23 boys were hospitalized with
wounds for life. Gilad phoned to tell us that he was going to the 5 boys
funerals. 4 in Jerusalem and the other in Petach Tikva. Transportation was
being provided by the school. Gilad returned 15 minutes before Shabbat
commenced. He was sunburned and literrally drained. (He actually looked
quite well with his pony tail and now much darker skin.) He'll be 19 on
April 20th and already has been to more funerals than I have by 35.
On Friday night in Schul, the Rabbi announced special psalms to be said
before the shabbat prayers and then he gave a short sermon. The Rabbi
remarked that he attended some of the funerals. But, he told of the faith
of one boy who he has known for 12 years and who went to each funeral. He
was talking about Gilad, whom he did mention by name. He said that he saw
Gilad with his mates and showed such strength and faith that he needed to
commend him. He knew that Gilad knew some of these boys for a number of
years as they went through high school and junior high school together.
The schule's announcements included that they wished to be together with
Gilad and his prayers for "Gomel" ( fate) being good to him this day.
Just three months ago, all of the families were invited on Hanukah to see
this unique community. On one side, the refuge camp of Khan Yunis. The
other side , a beduin camp leading to Rafiach and the Egyptian border.
Conversely, on the eastern side, the most beautiful beaches seen in Israel.
Sand as white as snow which would be the dream of any resort in the world
would want to possess.
So, I had a strong drink (southern comfort) on Shabbat. Although I should
have had it Thursday night or Friday night as, for sure, I lost some sleep.
Gilad and my other sons also joined me in a "l'haim" and maybe you all
Nahum is a business consultant and accountant who lives and works in Jerusalem. Nahum is married and the father of four boys, ages 14 to 22. Gilad is son number three, and will be 19 next month.
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
the Israel Resource
The Israel Resource Review is brought to you by
the Israel Resource, a media firm based at the Bet Agron Press Center in
Jerusalem, and the Gaza Media Center under the juristdiction of the Palestine
You can contact us on firstname.lastname@example.org.