Israel Resource Review |
5th October, 2001 |
Contents:
Al Aqsa mosque official Sheikh Khalil Al Alami:
There is a New Generation That is Willing to Fight America
This week Palestine Report Online interviews Sheikh Khalil Al Alami,
Palestine Authority Islamic official at Al Aqsa Mosque, on Islam and the recent attacks on the United States.
|
PR: What is the Islamic position on the September 11 attacks on
Washington and New York?
Alami: There is an important point that should be made in answering
this question. Anyone who ever read about Islam would know of the
forgiveness preached in Islam and the greatness of the religion. It is a
religion that preaches tolerance and humanity.
When talking about what happened in the United States, one question
that poses itself is: what pushed these people to do what they did? What
were their motives? Why did they feel they had to do this? No matter
who did it - even if the fingers are pointed at Al Qaida and Osama bin
Laden - there is one thing that is important here. Islam has a
comprehensive view of things. Its outlook is not limited to an
organization, a party or group. Islam is greater than that and is not seen
from one narrow perspective. Muslims always try to look farther than
that because our religion is much larger than any group or person.
What is important to say here is that, as Muslims, we are not against the
American people as a people or nation. But we oppose their policies of
arrogance, of dominance and of double standards. Why is our Orient
always being pulled into these things? America has a targeted enemy so
it can oppress the peoples of this "enemy" and sap their resources. It is
as if it is part of some strategy to always have an enemy that must be
fought, and through this, achieve goals.
The dangerous thing now is that our Islamic Orient is the goal of these
campaigns. As proof, let me say this. When the president of the most
powerful country in the world says that this is a "crusade," this is no
mistake. He did not just say it by mistake and then retreat from it. They
want to establish a clash of civilizations. This is their obvious way of
continuing to practice oppression, injustice and subjugation.
Now, as Muslims, we are to act according to what Islam dictates to us -
that is, you may assault whoever assaults you. But for them to come to
the Orient of Islam, oppress and subjugate us, while we are to sit doing
nothing? We cannot just stand there and watch. These [American
actions] are not only a response to what happened on September 11;
there were plans to this effect before and after.
As for the people who carried out the attacks - they were not madmen.
We read about their lives in the press. Most were from the Gulf and
were well-off. They didn't have any social or personal complexes that
one might say they were reacting to. On the contrary, now we can say
that there is a new generation that is willing to fight America and this is
something that America cannot stop.
PR: Following the September 11 attacks, strong anti-Muslim and anti-
Arab sentiments have developed in the West. How can Muslims counter
this?
Alami: What is required from our Muslim and Arab world - and I do not
differentiate between the two - is to clarify what Islam's true
approaches are, what are its teachings. What we need to get across to
the world is that as Muslims, we have a unique way of thinking, we have
innovation and individualism. Islam has left its mark.
But the Islamic world directs its media efforts at its own people, as if it
needs to convince them. The media mechanism in the Arab and Muslim
world has been useless in getting the message to the West that this
religion is one of enlightenment, innovation, uniqueness and all other
qualities that make it great. This has not been received by the Western
world in any way.
The second step is that the scholars of the umma [Islam's followers]
must meet. They must elevate the status of Islam through a consensus
between them. This needs to be done. I hope to God this will happen.
Because - let me say this as a Muslim - nowadays, we need to defend
ourselves against being called terrorists and only then can one speak of
Islam. These scholars must convey to the Western mind the entire and
overall principles of Islam.
But the world will never return to what it was before September 11. A
new world order is in formation. Now Europe and the so-called
coalition against terrorism is working towards getting America focused
on one enemy - not necessarily the Afghans - and becoming a hostile
force against Islam.
How can the umma work together as one and speak in one voice in this
regard? America always speaks as if from a pedestal so the Muslims'
voice must be strong and united to get the message across that we are a
religion of tolerance. The best example of this is the Palestinians. Here
in Jerusalem exist the largest group of churches in the world. And they
have existed here for hundreds of years in peace.
PR: In light of the current threats to strike the Muslims of Afghanistan,
is it permissible for other Muslim countries to take part in this
coalition?
Alami: No, not in any case. America claims that it was attacked by a
group of Muslims, so America can decide how to respond to this.
However according to Islamic law, Al Shariya, no Muslim can be part of
or support this because in Islam, Muslim brothers must bond together.
If America wants to respond, it can respond on its own.
PR: If the United States' claims that Osama bin Laden and the Qaida
network are responsible for the attacks on New York and Washington
proves true, would you say that bin Laden diverted from true Islam to
serve his purposes?
Alami: I always say that I do not view Islam through Osama bin Laden or
anyone else. I do not want to portray him as some kind of hero. Islam is
bigger than Osama bin Laden and any organization. I do not believe in
deifying anyone. So I will not portray bin Laden as a hero, nor will I
interpret Islam through him. -Published 3/10/01 (c)Palestine Report
Published at
www.jmcc.org/media/reportonline
on October 3, 2001
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Russia Expects Mild U.S. ReactionTo Iran Deal
Steve Rodan
Bureau Chief, Middle East News Line
MOSCOW [MENL]
-- Russia expects a mild U.S. response to what could be a $1.5
billion arms deal between Moscow and Iran.
|
Russian officials and analysts said the Bush administration does not want to
divert attention away from Washington's efforts to form a coalition against
terrorism. Moscow has supplied intelligence and other aid for the U.S.-led
campaign against Saudi billionaire Osama Bin Laden.
Iran, the analysts said, has quietly turned into a normal state for the
United States despite Teheran's support of such Islamic insurgency groups as
Hizbullah, Hamas and the Islamic Jihad. They said Washington recognizes the
importance of Iran in any U.S. offensive against neighboring Afghanistan.
"It seems to me that now, in the new context, the political and
military-political context, we have to break the perception of Iran as a
devil," said Konstantin Makiyenko, deputy director of the Moscow-based
Center for Strategic and Technological Analysis. "Because this perception
was largely molded by the United States based on internal political
considerations and I think that now we have to get away from this
perception. Iran is a sufficiently normal state for the region."
The United States failed to respond immediately to Tuesday's announcement of
a military cooperation agreement between Moscow and Teheran. The agreement
is said to pave the way for Russian arms sales to Iran of $300 million
annually over the next five years.
Officials and analysts said Iran will also be a partner of Russia in the
U.S.-led attempt to overthrow the Taliban regime. They said Russia will sell
weapons that will eventually end up in the hands of the northern-based
Afghan opposition. The Iranian-Russian partnership, they said, will also
seek to contain Turkey, a rival of both Moscow and Teheran.
"There are serious military-political partnerships, notably in the field of
containing the Taliban movement, and military-political containment of
Turkey," Ivan Safranchuk, the Moscow representative of the Washington-based
Center for Defense Information, said.
The analysts said the major source of aid to Bin Laden comes from the Gulf
Cooperation Council countries and Pakistan. The leading sponsors of Bin
Laden and Taliban, they said, are Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
This service contains only a small portion of the information produced daily
by Middle East Newsline. For a subscription to the full service, please
contact Middle East Newsline
at editor@menewsline.com
for further details.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
U.S. Proposes Removing Syria From Terror List
Steve Rodan
Bureau Chief, Middle East News Line
U.S. Proposes Removing Syria from Terror List
WASHINGTON [MENL] -- The Bush administration has proposed removing Damascus
from the State Department's list of terrorist sponsors if Syria joins a
U.S.-led coalition against Saudi billionaire fugitive Osama Bin Laden.
U.S. officials said the State Department has relayed such a message to
Damascus. Officials said the message asserted that Syrian participation in
an international coalition would be seen as evidence that Damascus has
renounced support for terrorism. The message also urged Syria to restrain
Hizbullah and Palestinian groups from attacking Israel's northern border.
The removal of Syria from the State Department terrorist list would make
Damascus eligible for both military and civilian aid. Officials said Syria
remains on the terrorist list largely because of its refusal to expel
Kurdish, the Lebanese Hizbullah and Palestinian insurgency groups.
|
"We view Syria as small potatoes in terms of terrorism," a State Department
official said. "Syrian participation in the coalition could tip the balance
and finally remove Damascus from the terrorism list."
President George Bush has requested from Congress legislation that would
grant him the authority to waive restrictions on U.S. military and civilian
aid to any foreign country. Officials said the request is meant to grant the
president the ability to quickly reward so-called rogue states such as Iran,
Syria and Sudan for any support of the U.S.-led battle against Bin Laden and
his cohorts.
"We have an ongoing dialogue with Syria on the subject of the activities in
the Bekaa Valley, and other activities that Hizbollah has carried out,"
State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said. "And we have asked them, as
well as all others, to use their influence to rein in these kind of
activities."
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
UNRWA Director Peter Hansen Opposes Solving Palestinian Refugee Problem
Jerusalem Times, September 28, 2001
[IMRA: The policy of the UN everywhere in the world - with the exception of
the Palestinian refugees - is to help promote the resettlement of refugees
so that they can move on with their lives. In this article UNRWA director
Peter Hansen makes clear that UNRWA supports keeping the Palestinian
refugees hostage to Arab-Israeli conflict.]
|
Full Text: UNRWA feels the pinch of the siege
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency has for the past 51 years
afforded support for the Palestinian people, moving its headquarters from
Geneva to Gaza five years ago.
On a visit to Egypt cut short by deteriorating conditions in the Palestinian
territories, UNRWA director Peter Hansen assured that conditions in the
Palestinian territories are very serious, according to him worse than they
have ever been in the year-old intifada.
Hansen said that the agency is doing all it can to alleviate the suffering
and fear of Palestinian citizens, who face Israeli heavy machines at night
and are deprived the simplest constituents of normal living. He indicated
that Israeli authorities have spared no effort in positing obstacles in the
way of UNRWA employees, who are often stopped at checkpoints and denied
travel permits. Additionally, occupation authorities force UNRWA employees
at times to abandon their vehicles and walk, subjecting them to grave danger
by gunfire often aimed just above their heads to scare them. "Despite it
all," said Hansen, "we are able to help residents and afford them food,
thanks to the courage of our cadres."
As for the situation in Gaza, Hansen said that 80% of Gaza residents are
registered at UNRWA as refugees. "We do not ask people seeking assistance to
show refugee cards at present because of the prevalent conditions. We help
whoever is in need, which at present includes 50% of the people."
About reaction to the difficulties and impediments imposed by Israeli
authorities, Hansen explained, "we continue to submit complaints about
Israeli practices and obstacles impeding our operation." He indicated that
he would forward his annual report to the UN in September to indicate the
Israeli harassment.
On another front, the UNRWA general director emphasized the need to
coordinate efforts to escape the current crisis, indicating that the freeze
of normal life affects the Israelis more than it does the Palestinians, who
have endured long years of torment.
Hansen called for efforts to convey clearly the situation on the ground,
without diminishment or exaggeration, indicating that the time has come to
remedy the miserable conditions of refugees, totaling four million, who have
for four generations yearned for a better life. Hansen assured that the
plight of refugees cannot continue as is and that the Palestinians cannot
wait forever.
Concerning Israeli claims that it can withstand the current fight until the
year 2006 said Hansen, "this would bode ill for the Palestinians. However,
the situation would be much worse for Israel as an occupying country using
force to impose its policies."
Commenting on the use of US-made jet fighters against Palestinian civilians
Hansen offered, "I do not think the US afforded those fighters to Israel to
be used against civilians and refugees. I am convinced that Washington makes
clear to every party it supplies with weapons and military ability the
boundaries they must honor in using those weapons." As for his outlook
regarding an end to the crisis and the Israeli escalation of military action
by infiltrating Palestinian territories, Hansen indicated that there is no
easy way out, stressing the need to increase efforts and support from the
international community.
Hansen also replied to questions about the notion of settling Palestinian
refugees in host countries and the suffering of refugees in refugee camps
and the role of the agency in relieving the suffering. He said, "there could
not be any discussion of settling refugees. Such consideration would only be
made within the framework of a peace agreement. It is necessary for
Palestinian refugees to enjoy their rights like all other refugees across
the world, but I do not think that we are the point of discussing that right
now and I do not believe that settlement should be considered as a solution
at present. The problem requires a just solution, and until that is
achieved, UNRWA will continue its work."
Hansen indicated that the difficulty facing the agency is the lack of
funding, mainly because donor countries failed to fulfill pledges they had
made. He explained that the funds requested are considered vital and are
considerably low, not exceeding 20 cents per refugee per day to cover
healthcare, education and social services.
The UNRWA annual budget is limited to $371m covering four million refugees,
which translates into $75 per refugee per year. "It is important to afford
better assistance to Palestinian refugees, who make up the biggest refugee
problem in the world," said Hansen, assuring that the Palestinian refugees
need and deserve support.
Hansen indicated that Egypt has increased contributions to UNRWA more than
ten times, reaching $140,000, saying that if other parties followed in the
footsteps of Egypt it would be easier to cope with the problem. He stressed
that the international community must assume responsibility toward the
plight of Palestinian refugees, considering it an international predicament.
The UNRWA director, who on his short visit to Egypt met with the Secretary
General of the Arab League, Amr Mousa, praised the efforts of the Arab
League for supporting UNRWA.
Hansen indicated that of the $78m emergency budget defined by the agency to
contend with the exceptional circumstances, only 50% has been secured,
saying that important contributions have recently been made by Saudi Arabia,
Libya and the UAE. Kuwait, despite its smallness, is considered one of the
five top donors to UNRWA, with the other four being Norway, Sweden, Denmark
and Netherlands.
Worthy of note, US contributions to UNRWA total $90m annually, while the
cost of one F-16 jet fighter is $300m, equal to the entire annual budget of
UNRWA.
About the dependability of UNRWA to afford refugees food and basic supplies
in light of the Israeli obstacles said Hansen, "UNRWA hopes to be the
channel through which Arab states afford assistance, considering the agency
the most developed and versed party in distributing aid and handling
emergencies. We hope that Arab countries provide support as do other states
around the world."
Hansen added that Arab nations are exhibiting great solidarity and
generosity in helping the Palestinians in their unprecedented ordeal. UNRWA
employees and schoolchildren in Syria donated $500,000 in support of the
UNRWA emergency program, of which Hansen said, "such feelings abound in the
Arab World; and it is only a matter of time until similar acts of kindness
would be carried out in tangible contributions to the emergency program."
With the nearing of the scholastic year and UNRWA assistance to students
offered the agency director, "we are convinced that the situation will
neither be easy nor normal, but we will do our utmost to overcome
difficulty. We cannot bear the thought of seeing an entire generation
deprived education."
Hansen explained that the agency is inventing ways to cope with the
situation. For example, teachers unable to leave their villages and cities
were recruited at the nearest school to substitute for teachers from other
areas.
Regarding the International Conference against Racism in Durban, South
Africa and the discussion about equating Zionism with racism, Hansen
explained that UNRWA did not participate in the conference but is a part of
the UN and is based on human rights agreements. Hansen warned that using
terms that cause disagreement would undoubtedly raise the magnitude of the
conflict. He added, "I hope that participants in the conference reach a
proper language accepted internationally without taking away from the
authority or the weight of the UN and its ability to undertake its role."
Hansen concluded, "I hope the US administration realizes the message being
voiced by the world asking it to assume a leadership role concurrent with
its status as the most powerful state in the world." Al Quds
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Voice of Palestine Radio:
No Arrests of Wanted Killers, Wounded Motorists Described As Illegal Settlers, Allegation that IDF has Assigned SLA Troops to Checkpoints
On October 1, 2001, Tafik Tirawi, Palestinian head of Intelligence in the West Bank district of the Palestinian National Authority, was asked on The VOICE OF PALESTINE Radio at 8 a.m. about Israel's demand to that he arrest terrorists, according to a list that Israel Foreign Minister Shimon Peres handed to Yassir Arafat on their September 26th meeting in Gaza.
|
Tirawi responded by saying that "there are no terrorists. We will arrest no one. Those who open fire on Israelis are not terrorists. It is the Israelis who are terrorists. We say to the Israelis that your state is the terrorist state that opens fire on our people. You are first requires to arrest your settlers and soldiers. We gave you a list of real terrorists whom you have yet to arrest . . . Arik Sharon used terror in killing at Deir Yassin, killing Egyptian prisoners, killing Palestinians in Sabra/Shatilla.
On Thursday morning, October 4th, the VOICE OF PALESTINE radio newsreel of the Palestinian Authority reported the shooting attack on the Givat Zev-French Hill road inside Jerusalem in which a young couple were badly injured as an attack against two illegal settlers on the illegal settler road inside Jerusalem.
In its newscasts throughout the day on Thursday, October 4, the VOICE OF PALESTINE radio newsreel of the Palestinian Authority reported that Israel has positioned Christian troops from the Southern Lebanese Army at all checkpoints and at all key positions. While the VOICE OF PALESTINE radio newscaster did indeed broadcast Israeli denials of such, the VOICE OF PALESTINE repeated the news item on each broadcast, with the claim that Israel Prime Minister Arik Sharon has positioned the SLA troops in preparation for another Sabra and Shatilla massacre, reminding the Palestinian Arab public of what occurred in Lebanon in September, 1982,(when Sharon was the Israel Minister of Defence and Israel's Christian allies in Southern Lebanon killed civilians in the Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps in retaliation for the assassination of Lebanese Prime Minister Bashir Gemayel). VOICE OF PALESTINE specifically alleges that SLA troops were abusing Palestinian Arab women at IDF checkpoints.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Go to
the Israel Resource
Review homepage
The Israel Resource Review is brought to you by
the Israel Resource, a media firm based at the Bet Agron Press Center in
Jerusalem, and the Gaza Media Center under the juristdiction of the Palestine
Authority.
You can contact us on media@actcom.co.il.
|