Israel Resource Review |
25th October, 2002 |
Contents:
UNICEF: Why is this Halloween
Different from Any Other Halloween?
David Bedein
UNICEF: Why is this Halloween Different from Any Other Halloween:
This year, UNICEF treats you with a new trick against Israel.
We all remember UNICEF. That is the agency that provides little boxes for
collection on Halloween in order that children around the world should not
starve. UNICEF, to its credit, had kept its distance from the middle east
conflict, unlike other agencies of the UN.
This year, UNICEF treats us with a new trick this Halloween.
Towards this year's Halloween collections, Pierre Poupard, the UNICEF
Special Representative to the Palestinian Authority, issued a scathing memo
in which he accused Israel of preventing 226,000 Palestinian Arab children
from going to school.The original release can be found on the UNICEF web site at: http://www.unicef.org/media/newsnotes/02nn34opt.htm.
Reached at the UNICEF office in Jerusalem, Mr. Poupard claimed not to know
that PA schools are being used as a place of terror training or incitement
of youth to war against Israel.
When I spoke with Mr. Poupard, he seemed to have no idea that current
curfews are the direct result of continued Palestinian Authority sponsored
terrorism, much of which takes place in the PA schools. Mr. Poupard of
UNICEF claimed not to know of the study published on August 26th conducted
by Israel's leading newspaper, Yediot Aharonot, which showed that military
training had become an integral part of Palestinian Authority educational
system, and that children learn the art of weaponry training in the PA
schools and school yards.
Mr. Poupard of UNICEF claimed not to have ever read the widely circulated
piece from the front page of the New York Times on August 3, 2000 in which
the New York Times correspondent John Burns reported how the PA education
ministry had recruited 25,000 children from ages 9 and 10 to train them in
their school yards in the art of military confrontation with Israeli
soldiers and civilians, In Burns detailed report, he noted how children
learned the art of throwing molotov cocktails at passing Israeli vehicles.
Mr. Poupard of UNICEF claimed not to know that the PAšs deputy minister of
education, Naim Abu Humus, called on school administrators to dedicate the
first class to praying for the souls of the suicide bombers killed during
the uprising, saying, "Today we glorify Al-Aksa and Palestine, and remember
the Palestinian martyrs"
Mr. Poupard of UNICEF claimed not to know that Signs on the walls of the PA
kindergartens proclaim their students as the 'shaheeds' [martyrs] of
tomorrow.
Mr. Poupard of UNICEF claimed not to have ever seen the curriculum of the
Palestinian Authority school system which is available for public scrutiny
at www.edume.org
Pierre Poupard of UNICEF does have a trick to treat Israel with, and that is
what he calls "Israelšs obligation, according to the 4th Geneva Convention
and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, to ensure education is
accessible to every Palestinian child".
What Mr. Poupard of UNICEF claimed not to know, however, is the extent to
which the Rights of the Child are routinely violated by Yasser Arafatšs
Palestinian Authority. All Mr. Poupard of UNICEF would have to do is to turn
on PA educational TV, whose theme since its inception in 1994 has invoked
the violation of the UN "rights of the child" by mandating children to
become suicide bombers, by placing children in the front-lines of armed
demonstrations against Israeli soldiers, and by delivering busloads of
Palestinian school children to participate in riots everywhere, thus
endangering the lives of the same children that are supposed to be defended
and protected by the Palestinian Authority. Through its curriculum of war
denies Palestinian children the fundamental right to peaceful, modern
education.
The trick that UNICEF treats Israel with is that it ignores the significant
steps taken by Israel to establish a modern educational system for
Palestinians Arabs after the Israel Civil Administration took over in Judea,
Samaria and Gaza in 1967, even in the absence of peace.
UNICEF could conduct its own trick or treat and ask any graduate of the
Palestinian Authority educational system:
"What did you learn in school today, dear little boy of mine"?
The Jerusalem Post, September 9, 2002
UNICEF Goodwill Envoy: Bush is modern-day Hitler
by Michael Freund
Dourade Lahham, a Syrian actor who serves as an honorary ambassador of the
United Nations Childrenšs Fund (UNICEF), lashed out at US President George
W. Bush on Friday, describing him as a ŗmodern-day Hitler˛, the Beirut Daily
Star reported yesterday.
Lahhm, who toured Beaufort Castle and visited the Lebanese-Israel border at
the invitation of Hezbollah, said that he was proud of his association with
the terrorist group. Speaking with reporters, he expressed the hope that
Bush, the modern-day Hitler, puts me on his black list. Lahham was
re-appointed in February to serve as a UNICEF goodwill envoy through May,
2003.
USA National Office
United States Fund for UNICEF
Mail Address
Charles Lyons President
333 East 38th Street - GC-6
New York, New York 10016
Telephone: 1 (212) 686.5522
Fax: 1 (212) 779.1679
Email: claporte@unicefusa.org
UNICEF International Office
Mail Address
Executive Director Carol Bellamy
UNICEF House
3 United Nations Plaza
New York, New York 10017
U.S.A.
Telephone: 1 (212) 326.7000 - Switchboard UNICEF House
Fax
1 (212) 887.7465 - Primary
1 (212) 887.7454 - Secondary
Email: cdier@unicef.org
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Frightened and Deprived
Palestinian Children
Peter Hansen
Commisioner General of UNRWA
Imagine the political fallout if every schoolchild in London had missed a month's schooling last year because teachers could not get to classes. Think of the parental anguish and outrage if the Paris school system saw its pass rates in French language exams fall from 71 to 38 percent in a year. Now picture your own child traumatized by fear, because every day her journey to school meant a trip past tanks, checkpoints and soldiers. This nightmare is the reality facing Palestinian parents, teachers and around a million pupils - the school population of a major European capital - in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip after two years of the intifada.
The main causes of this educational crisis are the curfews and closures imposed by the Israeli authorities in their attempt to deal with Palestinian militants. These have crippled the education program of the Palestinian Authority and the United Nations. The UN Relief and Works Agency runs 264 schools for almost 250,000 pupils in the West Bank and Gaza.
Last year it lost an average of 29 working school days per school because staff or pupils could not get to their classes. Last year, in total, 72,000 teacher workdays were lost. Exams could be given only when curfews were lifted, and summer schools, designed to create a secure environment for children, were barely attended. Things this year seem, if anything, to be getting worse. Since school started on August 31, 36 UN schools in the West Bank have been closed for from two to 15 days. Access to schools in Nablus has been so bad that some teachers have been hired based only on telephone interviews and will meet their supervisors only when they can get to work. But closed schools are only one part of the story.
Military operations, largely by Israel but in some instances by Palestinian factions, have violated the sanctity of schools across the occupied territory. Scores of schools have been used as detention centers, almost 200 have been damaged by gunfire and more than 170 students have been arrested. According to an Amnesty International report, 250 Palestinian schoolchildren have been killed since September 2000. It is not uncommon for children to be searched and abused by Israeli troops on their way to and from school or to be subject to tear gas and warning shots near checkpoints. This terrifying environment has had a devastating effect on Palestinian children. Exam pass rates in Arabic and math have collapsed, while dropout rates are starting to rise for the first time in a decade. Pupil assaults on teachers, unthinkable in the past, have begun to make an appearance. Teachers are increasingly reporting signs of psychological trauma.
UNRWA has employed counselors to encourage children to share their experiences and has boosted its remedial and summer school programs, as well as extended its school year, in an effort to mitigate the worst effects of the conflict. But it is becoming ever more apparent that Palestinian children will be paying twice over for the crisis in the West Bank and Gaza. Already they have paid with the loss of their security, innocence and education. But they will also pay with their futures. They will pay with the loss of opportunity, development and hope that a sound education brings. This is a tragedy for the Palestinian people,
who, with so many disadvantages to cope with, have traditionally put great stock in education.
Palestinian literacy rates were among the highest in the region. Palestinian girls were the first in the Arab world
to achieve educational parity with boys. All of which meant that Palestinian-educated engineers helped build the Gulf
region and Palestinian-educated doctors have benefited communities from California to Cairo.
It is imperative that the Israeli authorities begin to lift
their curfews and closures on population centers now, before
more damage is done to children. Israel has security concerns -
and Amnesty reports that 72 of its children have been killed
since the start of the intifada - but I cannot believe that
those security concerns are being served by depriving a
generation of Palestinians of their right to a future.
This article ran in International Herald
Tribune on October 9, 2002
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Tayoush: Fabricating a Story
About Palestinian Children Who Cannot Go to
School
And Who is Behind Tayoush?:
the Senior Pundak & Senior Melchior
David Bedein
(Excerpted
from an article in the weekly, Makor Rishon, published on
October 25, 2002.)
|
Following Israel's "Defensive Shield" operation against PLO strongholds
that followed the Passover seder massacre in Netanya last April, Herbert
Pundak, former chief editor of the Danish daily newspaper Politiken, and
now a columnist for that paper, decided to "do something to activate
readers in support of Palestinian Civil Society After Jenin", in the words
of Pundak.
Herbert Pundak, father of Ron Pundak, head of the Peres Center for Peace in
Tel Aviv, said that he launched the appeal to the Danish public to "to ask
readers for money for two purposes . . . to support the purchase of a new
ambulance for the Palestinian Red Crescent (whose honorary president is
Fatchi Arafat, the brother of Yassir), and support an organization known as
Tayoush (Arabic for "cooperation") which is supplying equipment and support
for Palestinian communities.
Herbert's son Ron Pundak offered to use the good offices of the Peres
Center to facilitate these contributions for Palestinian communities. "Not
that this is a Peres Center project", said the younger Pundak, "since we
are only the facilitators of such a worthy effort", he added.
The former director of the Peres Center, Carmi Gillon, appointed by Israeli
Foreign Minister Shimon Peres as the ambassador to Denmark, raised no
objections to efforts to raise funds for Palestinian Arabs that would be
facilitated by the same Peres Center.
To establish further credibility for the campaign, Hebert Pundak enlisted
the support of the former chief Rabbi of Denmark, Rabbi Bent Melchior, who
is the father of the current Israel Deputy Foreign Minister Rabbi Michael
Melchior. After the senior Rabbi Melchior said that his involvement for
Tayoush was his own initiative, he was satisfied that his son lent support
for his father's "humanitarian" initiative.
Yet Tayoush is not quite a "humanitarian" initiative. In Jerusalem, Tayoush
shares offices with the Alternative Information Center, 6 Shlomtizon
HaMalka Street in Jerusalem, acts as the hub of radical left activity in
Israel. Tayoush's own website, located at http://tayoush.tripod.com is
clear about its purpose: to help the Palestinians in their struggle, and to
expel the Jews from areas taken by Israel in 1967.
Tayoush in action: Claiming that Israeli "settlers" prevent Palestinian
children from going to school.
This week, Tayoush issued a leaflet in Arabic, Hebrew and English in which
it claimed that Israelis who live in Jewish communities in the Southern
Hebron region were preventing Palestinian Arab children from nearby Arab
villages from going to school for many months. For that reason, Tayoush
announced that it had raised funds to organized a massive convoy to
accompany Arab children to school. On the answering machine of Tayoush, in
English, Arabic and Hebrew, at 03-6914437, you hear a recorded message to
join their convoy on Saturday, October 26th, "which is occuring because of
the Israeli settler harrassment of Palestinian children"
Tayoush provided what it had hoped would be credible eyewitness testimony
from Arab villagers from the villages of Tuba and Lakia that would attest
to their allegation that Israelis were preventing them from going to school.
Their story was different - that the Israeli army, in coordination with
Jewish communities in the area, had paved a new footpath for children to go
to school which would circumvent the roads and the Jewish communities that
are in the area.
565 shooting attacks against Jews had occurred over the past two years in
the South Hebron region, which had resulted in the deaths of eight Jewish
civilians.
Mahmud Hamamdeh, from the Arab village of Tuba, said that the school
children had nothing to do with these armed attacks and that "they would
'only' throw stones. After all, they are children, are they not", he claimed.
Mahmud made it clear that their schools were indeed open, that most of the
children were going to school, but that they resented the extra 45 minutes
that his children had to walk to school.
Another Palestinian Arab villager referred by Tayoush, Anwar Al Hajuj,
from the Arab village of Lakia, said that 21 pupils out of 65 students had
dropped out of school because they did not like the walk.
The accounts of Arab villagers were a far cry from the claims of Tayoush
website, which was that Israeli settlers were preventing Palestinian school
children from going to school for many months.
In other words, Palestinian Arab school children had been inconvenienced in
a time of war.
Would Tayoush change its allegations that a severe human rights violation
had occurred?
Hardly.
Tayoush spokesman Niv Gordon, reached at his East Jerusalem home, said that
"The creation of a special path for Arab children to go to school is Israeli Apartheid".
Gordon was emphatic that any separate path paved for Palestinian Arabs
would mean that Israel had adopted a policy of Apartheid.
Tayoush has invited the media to participate in its motorized procession this Saturday in which Tayoush leaders say that they will escort Palestinian school children to school in order to protect them from the threat of Jewish neighbors whom Tayoush claims will not allow them to get an education.
Will the media buy the story being spun by Tayoush? Time will tell.
Printer
friendly version of this article
Return to Contents
Go to
the Israel Resource
Review homepage
The Israel Resource Review is brought to you by
the Israel Resource, a media firm based at the Bet Agron Press Center in
Jerusalem, and the Gaza Media Center under the juristdiction of the Palestine
Authority.
You can contact us on media@actcom.co.il.
|