Israel Resource Review |
27th November, 2000 |
Contents:
Official PA Radio News
the PBC Radio
November 26
Summary and Analysis
VOP has been taking an uncharacteristically low-key tone
regarding Israeli casualties in the last few days.
|
It is not only that Israeli civilian deaths and casualties, even in major
attacks such as the Hadera car bombing, are reported tersely-if at all- even successful attacks on Israeli soldiers and officers are reported
laconically.
Even as Israeli newspapers are reporting that IDF commanders are noting the "operational achievements" and "improvements in sniping" by Palestinian soldiers, the Voice of Palestine is not citing these matters.
Normally, VOP would highlight an Israeli military setback or
disaster -- especially at the hands of Palestinians. But it appears that the
Palestinian Authority's radio outlet is pursuing a sophisticated media
strategy placing the Palestinians in the underdog role. This expresses itself in highlighting Palestinian deaths and casualties while remaining unusually modest regarding the PA's own military initiatives and successes.
VOP continues to devote the lead stories of its news summaries and
round-ups to descriptions of reported Israeli artillery barrages and
missile attacks on innocent civilian neighborhoods.
Newscaster Samir Intehr introduced an item about the death of a child
martyr: "The martyr deaths of the children of the Intifada continues,
felling innocent children for nothing more than throwing rocks
at the Occupier. So it was for the child Karam al-Kurd who was
martyred at 200 meters away from the site of a confrontation, by
shots that shattered his skull." The feature item described the
14 year-old Karameh who had gone to throw rocks with his elder
brother in Rafah (in Gaza). "The shots clove open the skull of
the child who fell into the arms of his brother, covering him
with blood on the road. But the occupiers were not satisied with
assassinating the child. They prevented a car from carrying him
to a hospital in Khan Yunis". The feature, read in a soft voice
by a female reporter (whose name was unclear), went on to
describe the parents' poetic reaction (literally, poetry) to
their son's death, their pride in his joining other martyrs in
heaven.
Morning Headlines (7 a.m., 8 a.m., 9 a.m.)
"Masses of our people in Jenin, Nablus and Khan Yunis will accompany four martyrs to their final rest with other Intifada martyrs today
(names
and ages given in detail); President Arafat calls for renewed efforts to
put end to Israeli aggression; President Arafat pushed or halt to Israeli aggression in meeting with Egyptian president Mubarak and contacts with Russian president Vladimir Putin; Minister Abd-Rabbo meeting with UN
Secretary General; Minister Abd-Rabbo says American media show understanding
for Israeli side, equalizing treatment of the crimes of the victimizer and
his victim."
Arafat Response (to question by VOP Gaza correspondent 'Adil Za'anun): "We
are working on the international level, on the Arab level and on the Islamic
level, on the United Nations level and with friends of peace -- the
Russian Federation and the United States of America- Euorpe and the
non-aligned nations, on an economic and diplomatic plane to firm up the
efforts of our people, to support our people at every instant, because our
people are a people of heroes.
Interview: Cabinet Secretary Ahmad Abdul-Rahman
"Israel continues to pursue a war of aggression and expansion. Israel
clings to war Israel wants to build a second Israel in the (West) Bank and
the (Gaza) Strip. They are not satisfied with the first Israel that was established in 1948. They want a second Israel, and that's why they are
pushing this battle. We have not seen peace since 1993 (note: Oslo
signings), but the Oslo peace is nothing but a counterfeit peace.
We have not seen that peace reinforced by an Israeli withdrawal, and we have not seen that peace implemented with the realization of Palestinian rights.
This solution of Judaizing Palestine entirely and of Judaizing Jerusalem and establishing a second Israel in the (West) Bank and Gaza will not stand. That is why for two months-for nearly two months-we have been (fighting) to prevent the realization of this goal.
The Palestinian people will not cease its intifada until Israel withdraws to the June 4 1967 borders without the shadow of a settlement or a settler inside Palestinian territory".
Return to Contents
Official PA Radio News
the PBC Radio
November 27
Summary and Analysis
VOP moved into its Ramadan schedule with a marked heightening of the
Islamic content of its programming, while escalating the rhetorical side of
its news reports. Israeli fire at Palestinian targets in Jenin and Beit
Jallah was characterized as "cold-blooded murder" "continuation of crimes" in news reports and headlines.
|
The main morning news show was pushed back from 7 a.m.
to 8 a.m., with the
broadcasting itself beginning at 7 a.m.
(instead of 6 a.m.) with Quaranic passages extolling the need for fasting.
VOP's detailed listing of martyrs and wounded (who were deemed "stars of
the blessed Intifada" or "stars of the martyred") led the news bulletins,
but these were sandwiched between special religious programming with a
marked militant political tone.
For example, the "Special Ramadan Show" written by Radwan Abu-Ayyash (the
director of the Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation) spoke of the need to "purify the Holy Land" from the "Zionist presence".
Morning Headlines
"Today is the first day of the blessed month of Ramadan, 1421 to the
Hejira (Muhammad's flight from Mecca to Medina); Occupation forces spray
their fire to all fronts in cold -blooded and tyrannical and fatal crimes,leading to the matryring of four youths;
General Abdel-Razik al Mujaidah says Israel's failure to meet its obligations means the failure of previous understandings; A fifth martyr in Gaza who died of wounds suffered earlier; the continuation of Israel's aggression while we Palestinians continue our struggle on a variety of levls as the Intifada settles down (literally: pitches its tent) in Ramadan as Ramadan settles down with the Intifada."
Tone
The start of Ramadan lends a background of protracted struggle and
suffering to Intifada as VOP commentators and PA officials reinforce the message that struggle will continue until all Palestinian goals are met.
Local Report From Qalqilya -- Mustafa Malkiy reporting
"It was cold-blooded murder as the occupation forces opened fire on one
of the youths and then prevented cars from taking them from the area. We
tried via the Red Cross to transfer the wounded. They refused that also, but
after around five hours of crimes with great forces from the Israeli army,
armored cars and two helicopters, they informed us we had four martyrs from
the youths of Qalqilya. But there may be a fifth martyr, whose identity is
unknown, who fell in their hands. From Qalqilya we wish you a blessed
Ramadan and we will continue our struggle until we have realized our
independence."
Return to Contents
Where Does The Money Go?
The Secret Millions of Senior PA Officials
Ronen Bergman
Even now, when the ground is burning and the
future of the peace process is cloudy, senior PA officials find
time to deal with the truly important things. The name of the
game is money, or to be more precise, the pocket and account
they land up in.
|
The Finance Ministry, the GSS, IDF Intelligence and DCO offices
have innumerable stories and information about corruption in the PA. It
was even suggested a week ago in the Prime Minister’s Bureau to threaten
publishing this information if the violence continued.
This matter involves the heads of the Palestinian regime in a knot
of complex circles of bribery, protection money, power struggles, politics
and social structure problems.
The border crossings are an excellent example. This is how it works:
Israel collects customs duties at the entrances and exits from the PA to
Israel, to Egypt and Jordan, for itself and the Palestinians. Israel is
obliged to return the portion owed to the PA, which after taking off
commission, comes to 40%. In ’97, the Palestinians asked that their
portion of the money collected at the Karni roadblock, about a million
shekel a month, be transferred to a new account. The Israeli Airport
Authority raised an eyebrow. It turned out that the new account was
registered on behalf of the National Palestinian Transit Authority.
Israel had not heard of this organization. An examination showed that the
real owner of the account was Mohammed Dahlan, head of the Palestinian
Preventive Service in Gaza. This was a private account, subject solely to
Dahlan's orders.
For Dahlan, this money serves as a base to fund his organization and his
hedonistic lifestyle. To this should be added more millions of shekels
from various taxes and protection money that he collects, such as the docks
for loading and unloading on the Palestinian side of the Karni crossing.
Dahlan is not alone in this business. Funding for all the PA’s swollen
organizations, mainly its security services, come from various taxes
transferred to personal coffers and are not channeled through a central
financial system. Some of the money goes into the private pockets of
commanders. Intelligence sources in Israel say that these taxes also
enable these organizations to increase their power in the struggle for
Arafat's legacy.
In Palestinian terms, a million shekel a month is a great deal of money.
The Airport Authority decided a month ago to stop the party and to
transfer the money to the central account of the Palestinian Finance
Ministry in Gaza. Dahlan, say sources in the PA, exploded with anger and
sent in his people, who demanded keeping the situation as it was.
Dahlan's emissary, who conducted the struggle with the Airport
Authority, was Arafat's economic consultant and close confidante, Mohammed
Rashid.
It is worth Rashid's while to help Dahlan out. Rashid is the
chief beneficiary of the PA's monopoly on gasoline, one of the strongest
and most profitable organizations in the PA.
This monopoly is dependent on a contract making him the exclusive contractor for gasoline signed with the Israeli Dor Energy company.
The organization providing the security entourage for Dor Energy trucks going in to the Gaza Strip are Dahlan's people, who receive their salary from that fictitious account that is replenished by the Karni crossing money.
Israel knows that senior PA officials fear the sensitivity of the
Palestinian public to stories of corruption. Security sources believe that
these latest riots are, to a certain degree, a warning signal to Arafat.
They are an indirect protest of the insiders -- those who were born and
grew up and suffered in the territories, who did the ground manual work in
the years of the Intifada and who make up the hard core of the Tanzim --
against the outsiders, Fatah members who lived the good life in Tunis and
Europe and took on the status of nouveau riche at the expense of the
Palestinian public.
For this reason, the GSS believes, two senior security heads, Jibril
Rajoub and Mohammed Dahlan, are not criticized and are safe from the public
anger. Both served long years in Israel jails are considered to have paid
a personal price. As for the rest, the anger toward them is great.
Israel exports goods worth two billion dollars a year to the PA while
the PA exports goods worth two billion shekel a year to Israel.
A source in the IDF Planning Branch says: “This situation sheds a great
shadow over the future of the PA as a sovereign state with a stable regime.
Lack of economic planning, adopting erroneous policies that are mainly for
narrow political interests and the rooting of corruption, nepotism and poor
administration as a norm, can, in the final analysis, lead to a rise in the
power of extremist movements in the territories and to a collapse of the
peace agreements.
In intensive debates last week in the Finance Ministry and the Prime
Minister's Office, those attending presented a series of ways of hitting
the PA and its leaders in their pocket. There were those who demanded
cutting off the PA's economic lifelines, and to publish embarrassing
information about senior officials.
Finance Ministry officials were opposed and approached the matter from a
purely economic angle: Israel must not, they argued, intervene in the PA’s
internal matters. Legalists at the meeting concurred. Israel, they
said, does not have the moral authority to demand excessive changes of
Arafat and to set an ultimatum to stop transferring customs duties. Others
said that such a step would not only be an obvious violation of signed
agreements, it would also be interpreted as a political attempt to escalate
the conflict with the Palestinians.
Security establishment figures said this would be an effective way of
punishing Arafat for the riots but that not only the Palestinians suffer
from corruption. They said that Israel would also bear the consequences if
Hamas power increased because of economic distress and because of a lack
of trust in the current leadership.
In any case, this is a decision for the prime minister. The security
establishment hopes that a direct threat on Yasser Arafat’s good name, as
well as on his associates, will be more effective. After one meeting an
Israeli security source said: I am sure the Palestinians would be happy to
know what we know about its leaders. The degree of the corruption, the
lack of shame, the depth to which senior PA officials dip into the public
pocket surprises me anew all the time. For example, a large Israeli
company bought an apartment in Ashkelon and holds parties there -- not
necessarily of the moral kind -- for a few senior PA officials, in exchange
for giving that company a monopoly on supplying an important product.
There are some there whose fingerprints are everywhere: monopolies,
importing cigarettes and gasoline, casino, border crossing taxes, licenses
and etc. Some are not embarrassed to manage the most trivial deals
themselves. Thus, for example, there are negotiations with garage owners
in Jaffa and Ramle on servicing and improving their Mercedes in exchange
for supplying them with stolen spare parts.
The main sources of corruption in the PA derive from the economic
agreements signed with Israel. The Paris agreement, signed in ’94,
states two laws: no economic border between Israel and the PA and one
customs arrangement. This means that Israel collects all the customs
duties on goods coming from overseas and gives the PA its share for goods
entering the PA. Every month between 200 and 240 million shekel are
transferred to the Palestinian coffers, constituting 60% of its budget.
The calculations on how much to transfer are based on receipts. The
more receipts they present, the more the PA receives. Israel has
intercepted messages passed by the Palestinian regime to merchants, asking
them to obtain more receipts from Israeli merchants and to try not to give
receipts for goods exported from the PA to Israel. So a large industry of
receipt forgers developed. Israeli crooks manufacture receipts for their
colleagues on the other side in exchange for goods that were never sold.
The Palestinians transfer them to their own Finance Ministry who transfer
them to Israel, which pays a lot of many, that is divided among everyone,
who laugh all the way to the bank.
At Camp David, there were discussions on the final status arrangement
between the economic and financial heads of both sides. Israel wanted to
put an end to the tax return story, which leads to increasing corruption,
and to create instead a free trade zone, where each side would collect its
own taxes.
The Israeli team, headed by the head of the budget department, was
surprised at the composition of the Palestinian team. “Where is Rashid,”
they asked when he didn’t come. “Rashid is at Camp David with the
chairman,Maher al-Matzri, the Finance Minister answered somewhat
embarrassed.
Mohammed Rashid did not budge from Arafat’s side throughout the summit.
Camp David established his status in the PA. He dresses elegantly,
speaks excellent English, is married to a beautiful Canadian woman and can
tell a good joke when it is called for. Rashid concentrates immense
financial power in his hands, both as senior economic consultant to the
rais and as a private businessman, nourished by the favors accorded him
thanks to his other role.
Israel estimates today that Rashid is the only one whom Arafat trusts
completely and he is also the only one, except for Arafat, who is familiar
with all the intricacies of the PLO’s assets in the world and in the PA.
Rashid's businesses branch out in all directions. Attempts by Israel to
follow the branches were useless. Rashid is linked to a network of
companies that branch downwards. He only holds shares in the parent
company, but the various subsidiaries are linked in practice to most of the
economic activity in the territories.
The colossal sums that Israel transfers to the PA are under the direct
control of Rashid. Thus two budget systems were created in the PA:
Rashid's, from which salaries are paid and over which there is no
supervision, and the budget for development and building infrastructure,
which includes the donations and is under the full control of the donor
countries.
When the Paris agreements were to be first implemented in 1994, the
Palestinians asked that the money be transferred to four different bank
accounts in the Bank of Palestine and the Arab Bank in Gaza.
Tax returns on gasoline were to be transferred to a secret account in Bank Leumi in Tel Aviv. Only Rashid and the chairman were signatories to this account.
Until half a year ago, 1.6 billion shekel were deposited in the account.
Then Rashid kept his promise and unified all the PA’s accounts into one
central account in the Arab Bank in Gaza.
What happened to the money in the Tel Aviv account? It depends who you
ask. Rashid claims that everything was transferred to the Palestinian
Finance Ministry. Israeli officials heard from Palestinian ministers that
most of the money was never transferred. Joseph Saba, director of the
World Bank in the territories, said last year: “We have no idea what
happened with this account.
The donor countries estimate that 30% of the hundreds of millions they
gave were indeed transferred to the Palestinian Finance Ministry. Around
40% pay for activities by PLO institutions worldwide and are invested in
welfare activities and support for orphans and widows in refugee camps in
Lebanon. The remaining 30% is for the private needs of senior PA officials
or were transferred overseas in case of an uprising or Israeli conquest.
Another major problem in the PA’s economic structure are the monopolies.
When the PA was set up, several areas were declared monopolies. It is not
clear why the PA finds it necessary to be involved in so many obviously
private ventures, unless it wants to give franchises to those close to
them, mainly Rashid.
The monopoly buys the product it is charged with for a certain price
from either the manufacturer or the Israeli importer and sells it in the
territories for much more. It is not clear where the difference goes, and
we are talking about sums in the hundreds of millions.
The U.S. State Department noted in the past, that there were 20
monopolies in the PA. For example there are monopolies on gasoline,
cement, cigarettes, gravel, animal feed, steel, meat, paint and
construction materials.
Other products are also not open to others. Nabil Shaath’s Egyptian
company, for example, imports computers into the territories; the Paaltek
company in Ramallah for electronic entertainment goods is owned by Yasser
Abbas (Abu Mazen's son) and Sammy Ramlawi. Many Palestinian businessmen
are very bitter over the monopolies, which have done away with competition
and have closed markets that were open under the Israeli occupation.
Originally appeared in Yediot Aharonot, November 10, 2000
Return to Contents
Saddam Hussein Speaks on Iraqi TV
On Nov 25, addressing a cabinet meeting, Saddam gave a fiery speech
attacking Israel and the US, calling on the Palestinians to continue
their uprising, and threatening Arab rulers who do not support them
sufficiently.
As Iraq TV reported, Saddam, referring to the US, said, "This enemy
cannot, cannot, cannot, cannot repent. The issue has nothing to do with
insufficient awareness, nor with a deficient choice of methods. The
heart of the matter is that the enemy seeks to set up a monstrous entity
to the Arabs' detriment, with a view to colonizing the Arabs, all Arabs,
through economy, financial speculation, politics, and the threat of
force.
"Palestine is the main battleground. It was the battleground it used
to set up its entity in the initial stages. However, all Arabs and all
Arab lands are now the target of its Jewish colonialist drive and greed.
The Palestinians cannot elicit a genuine Arab role [ED: response?]
unless they continue with the struggle. When they continue with the
struggle, the Arab regimes that do not pursue a pan-Arab approach will
either be toppled or change their approach. The regime that does not
change its approach will be toppled."
Saddam indicated that for him the Gulf war never ended. He said,
"Had not Iraq stood fast and made sacrifices for eight years during
Al-Qadisiyah [Iraq-Iran war] and for 11 years during the Mother of
Battles [the Gulf War], it would have been destroyed and we would have
been turned into refugees . . . .
change its approach will be toppled."
"The Arab people have not so far fulfilled their duties. They are
called upon to target US and Zionist interests everywhere and target
those who protect these interests [Ed: i.e. unspecified Arab
governments]. The latter will either correct their position -- through
supporting the battle and being part of it -- or fall down. . . . The
Arabs -- or some of them to be accurate and fair -- are working, at the
official level, more enthusiastically than America and the Zionist
entity to stop the intifadah at any cost at the expense of the
Palestinian question. They should know that either they embrace the
right position, in which they do not believe, or they will fall down or
be isolated. . .
"The Arab masses must uphold their principles, expose the stands of
the cowardly, and encourage those who, we hope, will continue to
struggle against the United States and Zionism and their interests
wherever they are. They have to direct the real struggle and jihad
against US interests in order to deter the aggressors. Only then will
the Arabs be said to have performed their duty. . . . As far as
principles are concerned, we in Iraq say that every immigrant Jew must
leave the land of Palestine and return to his country. This is Iraq's
stand. . .
"I would like an official memorandum to be sent to the United Nations
saying that we, in Iraq, would like to include the Palestinian people in
the oil-for-food formula and give a share from our money to the
Palestinian people. This memorandum should be officially dispatched in
the name of Iraq to the Security Council and the UN secretary general.
>From there, a share will be set aside for the Palestinian people."
As with Saddam's speeches that the regime considers important, this
speech appeared in the Iraqi press the next day, Nov 26, as Reuters
reported.
I. SADDAM'S FIERY SPEECH ATTACKING ISRAEL, US, ARABS
Baghdad Republic of Iraq Television in Arabic 1800 GMT 25 Nov 00
[FBIS Translated Text]
The mujahid leader, President Saddam Husayn, may God protect him, has
said that the Americans know that any proposal they make on the
intifadah will immediately be rejected by the Arabs. He said there is a
psychological structure that opposes anything presented by the United
States. Therefore, they, in agreement with the Zionists, are trying to
promote a series of ideas, which would inevitably, but implicitly,
involve some kind of a relinquishment of the past arrogance and a
different way of handling. However, I doubt if the Americans, who are
allies of the Zionists, can abandon the substance of their scheme, he
added.
The president's statements were made in a comprehensive and
important pan-Arab speech, which President Saddam Husayn, may God
protect him, made while chairing the Council of Minister's 49th session
during the Council's discussion of the intifadah of our people in
Palestine.
[Begin Saddam Husayn recording] The Americans know that the Arabs will
immediately reject any proposal they make. There is a psychological
structure that opposes anything presented by the Americans. Therefore,
the United States, in agreement with the Zionists, is trying to promote
a series of ideas, which would inevitably, but implicitly, involve some
kind of a relinquishment of past arrogance and a different way of
handling. However, I doubt if the Americans, who are allies of the
Zionists, can abandon the substance of their scheme.
Therefore, we may see a move in form, in secondary issues, and in
the way of handling, which means a maneuver to circumvent the unity of
the intifadah, the unity of the people of the intifadah and their
determination to continue their march toward liberation. Liberation is
the goal of the intifadah. The substance and goal of the Palestinian
people's intifadah is the liberation of their land. Can these
maneuvers, policies, and proposals allow them to achieve the liberation
of the land? The answer is no. No. Therefore, the most important thing
we want from the Palestinian leaders -- and I do not say the Palestinian
leadership only, but all the Palestinian leaders -- is not to pin any hope
on the short-term political solutions. They should show more endurance.
Anyone who wants to liberate his homeland should show greater endurance
and patience. The sacrifices should not pain him. I mean, the sacrifices
may pain him as a human being, but they should not weaken his
determination. Sacrifices may pain him from inside, but he should
endure the pain and keep his determination, so that he can liberate his
land. We are their brothers. We say Iraq is part of them. Iraq and
Palestine are brothers, both in terms of pan-Arabism and in terms of
jihad.
We remind them of this fact only in an effort to help them keep
their determination at the pace they wish it to be. We tell them that
the Iraqis have offered rivers of blood so that Iraq can keep its
sovereignty in full. The Iraqis have shown great readiness to offer
sacrifices for that goal. These sacrifices used to pain us, but we took
the pain in silence. We got used to handling this pain and continued to
offer sacrifices so that Iraq would not be lost, so that it would not
lose its historic opportunity to take control of the factors that can
augment its glory, status, and influence. This will allow its people to
become their own masters, and Iraq will not be lost in terms of
geography. Iraq was threatened. It was under threat as a civilization,
geography, culture, and position; and its immortal, high values were
threatened.
What is it that enabled Iraq to hold out and preserve all this? It
was its willingness to make sacrifices. Sacrifice is not confined to the
offering of martyrs, be they sons or brothers. When it takes over, the
leadership regards all the people as its children, brothers, and
fathers, each according to his or her age. Sacrifices should not be
regarded as painful. They should continue with their intifadah, with
God's blessings.
This enemy cannot repent [Saddam repeats the word "cannot" four
times]. The issue has nothing to do with insufficient awareness, nor
with a deficient choice of methods. The heart of the matter is that the
enemy seeks to set up a monstrous entity [kiyan miskh] to the Arabs'
detriment with a view to colonizing the Arabs, all Arabs, through
economy, financial speculation, politics, and the threat of force.
Palestine is the main battleground. It was the battleground it used
to set up its entity in the initial stages. However, all Arabs and all
Arab lands are now the target of its Jewish colonialist drive and greed.
The Palestinians cannot elicit a genuine Arab role unless they continue
with the struggle. When they continue with the struggle, the Arab
regimes that do not pursue a pan-Arab approach will either be toppled or
change their approach. The regime that does not change its approach
will be toppled. This will happen if the intifadah continues. But if,
God forbid, the Palestinians' stand experiences ups and downs upholding
seemingly wonderful slogans in the initial stages only to be diluted
subsequently, they would appear as if they were involuntarily giving
some Arab rulers the chance to engage in maneuvering without having to
choose between pursuing a pan-Arab approach, which entails true faith,
and a regime change.
We appeal to all the Palestinian people -- leadership and grassroots,
to the intifadah and those staging it -- to be careful about the
maneuverings. The United States may come up with solutions that can be
called political when in point of fact they may be designed to hurt the
Palestinian people and the Arabs. The United States may elicit the
support of others. In this regard, I do not want to point accusing
fingers at any party in the world except for the United States.
However, some world leaders are now courting the United States. They may
agree to play a role which they know will not be conducive to the
freedom of the Palestinian people nor to their leading a dignified life
and building a clear future.
But, when given such an assignment, and wanting to gain the familiar
appreciation, some may get engaged in such a task. That is, citing the
familiar refrain regarding the desire to achieve a cease-fire or to stop
the violence, some may rush to solutions that would eventually be
self-defeating and end up being to the Palestinians' detriment.
The solution is that since the objective is to liberate Palestine,
then they should continue. But if the objective was a partial
improvement of a certain situation along with the acceptance of the
Zionist colonization, then this is a different story and this is left to
them to assess. They are suffering, and the conflict is inequitable in
the technical sense of the word, but it is equitable in the historical
sense of the word. From a historical point of view, this means that any
step forward and any steadfastness for some time by the Palestinian
people will attract the depth of the Arab nation. Some Arabs will be
involved willingly, and others will be involved forcefully.
These stones will attract the depth of the Arab nation so that the
conflict, from a historical point of view, will be equitable. On the
other hand, the balance will be in favor of the Arabs, particularly in
favor of the Palestinians.
To say what is after this, what is after this is liberation,
steadfastness, patience, and sacrifice, which will achieve the
objective. Had not Iraq stood fast and made sacrifices for eight years
during Al-Qadisiyah [Iraq-Iran war], and for 11 years during the Mother
of Battles, it would have been destroyed and we would have been turned
into refugees. Zionism, the United States, and other well-known sides
also would have turned the Iraqis against each other until they would
lose all the exalted values and remain bodies without souls. However,
the Iraqis' insistence on jihad and struggle and their high readiness to
make sacrifices until they achieve the objective have actually achieved
the objective.
The most important thing we hope our Palestinian brothers will do,
providing that we are part of them and what affects them affects us, and
will consider that the most precious thing is their unity. There is
nothing more precious than the unity of ranks in the face of the danger
that threatens everything. Any flexibility among the Palestinians is
legitimate, while this flexibility should be calculated carefully with
the enemy.
Blood can only be rewarded by victory. It is the only thing that can
spare blood from being shed at a later time. Victory can save blood.
Any operation that does not lead to victory will be part of history, but
it will not reward blood. As long as the objective is not guaranteed
this action will possibly be repeated at any time and the bleeding will
continue. Historical opportunities are not always available for peoples
so that victory will be the price for their blood unless their leaders
are really alert.
The Arab people have not so far fulfilled their duties. They are
called upon to target US and Zionist interests everywhere and target
those who protect these interests. The latter will either correct their
position -- through supporting the battle and being part of it -- or fall
down. The Arab people should not labor under the illusion that they
have done their duties. They have not done so, neither in Iraq nor
anywhere else. In Iraq, the people have not fulfilled their duties yet.
We struggle to have the opportunity to fulfill our duties. Thus, no one
has the right to say that he or she has fulfilled his or her duties.
Only when we liberate Palestine can we say that we have fulfilled our
duties. No one has the right to say so before this is achieved.
The Arabs -- or some of them to be accurate and fair -- are working, at
the official level, more enthusiastically than America and the Zionist
entity to stop the intifadah at any cost at the expense of the
Palestinian question. They should know that either they embrace the
right position, in which they do not believe, or they will fall down or
be isolated.
The Arab people must not stop using all means possible to feel that
they are supportive of the Palestinians and to make the latter feel this
support. If they say that Palestine is their cause and that it is holy,
then they should offer a level of sacrifice that is commensurate with
this description. However, if they are only seeking to help [the
Palestinians] from afar -- like when Russia would help an African state,
the United States would aid an Asian country, or an Arab country would
help a distant third world country -- the matter is different.
The Arabs are one nation and Palestine is our cause. We are not
offering help, but rather playing our role. Do you think that the
leadership -- now that Iraq has expressed its position and made
preparations -- does not realize that it should be ready for a level of
sacrifices that are higher than what is ordinary in life? The Iraqi
leadership is aware of this and knows the fighters who have volunteered
to fight for the sake of Palestine.
We know that America and the Zionism are full of hatred against Iraq
because of its position. We, however, do not care because our position
is based on the principle that we are one nation, and that what happens
in Palestine is similar to what happens in Basra, Mosul, and Baghdad.
We have offered rivers of blood to keep Basra, Mosul, Baghdad, Karbala,
Al-Najaf, Al-Diwaniyah, Karkuk, and Irbil proud.
We have to rise up to this level of readiness to sacrifice for the
sake of Palestine. Any readiness that falls short of that signals a flaw
in our principles. We have sound stands and a fair-minded view of
principles. All Arab states, including Iraq, have thus far failed to
meet the minimum requirements of the stand they should adopt vis-a-vis
the Palestine cause.
The Arab masses must uphold their principles, expose the stands of
the cowardly, and encourage those who, we hope, will continue to
struggle against the United States and the Zionism and their interests
wherever they are. They have to direct their real struggle and jihad
against the US interests in order to deter the aggressors. Only then
will the Arabs be said to have performed their duty. Some will have
performed the minimum level of their duty, while others will be said to
have performed a fair enough share of their duty.
The demonstrations that took to the streets are not enough, nor is
it enough that people volunteered in Baghdad. The volunteering that took
place in Baghdad is a preparatory step so that soldiers can fight on the
land of Palestine or around it in order to liberate it. Participating in
the demonstrations and voicing condemnation or denunciation are quite
natural. We have to shift the preparations and efforts to a higher
level. We should not allow maneuvers and attempts to let down the
mujahid Palestinian people on the land of Palestine.
As far as principles are concerned, we in Iraq say that every
immigrant Jew must leave the land of Palestine and return to his
country. This is Iraq's stand. This is the sound stand that will
stabilize the world and the region and make everyone regain his fair
rights. As long as the immigrant Jews continue to live on the land of
Palestine and as long as Palestine continues to be usurped by the
Zionism, the region will never be stable at all.
The Arabs should communicate this to Britain, and to the United
States above all. They should tell them that their interests are
threatened as long as the Zionist entity continues to exist. If they
[the United States and Britain] do not feel this and if the United
States does not feel that all its interests and the flow of oil to it
are not guaranteed as long as the Zionist entity exists, they will never
disengage their strategic ties with the Zionist entity and stop
supporting it to the detriment of the Arabs. The Arabs should,
therefore, make the United States feel that all its interests in the
Arab World are threatened as long as the Zionist entity exists.
I would like an official memorandum to be sent to the United
Nations, saying that we, in Iraq, would like to include the Palestinian
people in the oil-for-food formula and give a share from our money to
the Palestinian people. This memorandum should be officially dispatched
in the name of Iraq to the Security Council and the UN secretary
general. From there [the UN], a share will be set aside for the
Palestinian people.
The memorandum should be prepared on a pan-Arab level. In other
words, we have to tell them that we are one nation and that the
Palestinian people are part of the Iraqi people. We have to tell them
that the Palestinian people are currently under siege and what harms
them does the same to the Iraqi people. This is our money. We want a
share in the memorandum of understanding to be allocated for the
Palestinian people in order to support their national and pan-Arab
stand, which is a legitimate right in defense of their territory in
accordance with the UN Charter. Once this approval is received, we are
ready to draft a list of the needs of the Palestinian people to be added
to our needs and subtracted from our funds. [end recording]
The cabinet also looked into the issues listed on its agenda and
took the appropriate decisions and recommendations.
The cabinet discussed amending Revolution Command Council [RCC]
Resolution No. 172 for the year 1991 pertaining to the soldiers
department. Under the proposed amendment, nonmilitary personnel who
played a distinguished role in the Al-Qadisiyah and the mother of
battles will be included and thus transferred to this department. The
cabinet recommended that this draft law be passed to the RCC for
endorsement.
The cabinet also agreed to introduce amendments to the special
constraints that restrict granting pieces of land to the military
personnel through their affiliate societies.
The cabinet also ratified a proposal by the Ministry of Transport
and Communications to grant incentives to the employees of the State
Facility of the Civil Aviation and the Central Bank.
The cabinet endorsed the funds allocated for digging wells in Altun
Cupri to provide Al-Ta'mim governorate with its water needs, offset
water scarcity, and provide drinking water for Karkuk on condition that
the project be included in the investment plan of the Interior Ministry
for the year 2001.
The cabinet also agreed to increase the annual allocations for the
housing units project which is intended to serve the faculty member
doctors, so that the Higher Education and Scientific Research Ministry
will be able to complete the requirements of this project during the
remaining time of this year.
The cabinet discussed a proposal to set up a fund for supporting the
internal departments of the Higher Education and Scientific Research
Ministry with the aim of providing the financial resources needed to
build or rent the internal departments, support, develop, and maintain
them. The cabinet recommended that this be passed to the RCC for
endorsement.
In order to reduce the construction of buildings and installations
without an official license issued by the Baghdad Municipality or the
concerned municipality in the administrative units, and in order to
maintain the basic design of Baghdad and the basic designs of other
municipalities, the cabinet endorsed a draft law amending the law of the
administration of municipalities No. 165 for the year 1964. After
introducing some amendments to it, the cabinet recommended that the law
be passed to the RCC for endorsement. [Video shows Saddam addressing
cabinet members]
[Description of Source: Official television station of the Iraqi
Government]
II. SADDAM'S SPEECH PRINTED IN IRAQ PRESS
Saddam Urges Palestinians to Continue Uprising
BAGHDAD, Nov 26 (Reuters) - President Saddam Hussein urged Palestinians
to continue their uprising against Israel and to ignore "short-sighted
political solutions" sponsored by the United States.
Iraq has supported the Palestinians over two months of Israeli-
Palestinian clashes and has called for Islamic Jihad "holy war" to
liberate Palestinian territory from Israel.
"What we hope from Palestinian leadership is that they should not
pin hope on short-sighted political solutions and they should be patient
because anyone who wants to liberate his country should show patience,"
Iraqi newspapers on Sunday quoted Saddam as saying.
Saddam, speaking during a cabinet meeting late on Saturday, also
called for confronting U.S. interests anywhere in the world.
"Arabs should direct their struggle and jihad against American
interests," he said.
Middle East diplomacy shifted to Egypt where President Hosni
Mubarak and a senior aide to Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak met to
explore ways of ending two months of bloodshed in the West Bank and
Gaza.
The Israeli official, Danny Yatom met Mubarak less than a week after
Egypt, the first Arab country to sign a peace treaty with Israel,
recalled its ambassador to Tel Aviv and accused the Jewish state of
aggression towards Palestinians.
Saddam had urged the United Nations to include relief supplies for
the Palestinian people under Iraq's oil-for-food deal with the world
body.
"I want an official memorandum to be submitted to the Security
Council and the Secretary-General asking for a quota for the Palestinian
people to be deducted from Iraq's revenues of the memorandum of
understanding," Iraqi television quoted Saddam as saying during a
cabinet meeting on Saturday.
Baghdad has always taken a hard line towards Israel and fired Scud
missiles at the Jewish state during the Gulf War. It also opposes peace
agreements signed between Israel and the Palestinians and those signed
with neighbouring countries.
Return to Contents
Go to
the Israel Resource
Review homepage
The Israel Resource Review is brought to you by
the Israel Resource, a media firm based at the Bet Agron Press Center in
Jerusalem, and the Gaza Media Center under the juristdiction of the Palestine
Authority.
You can contact us on media@actcom.co.il.
|